On deontic truth and values
This article analyzes the thesis of ethical relativism, as defended byAlchourrón and Bulygin (1983). These authors offer, on the one hand, a suggestiveconception according to which the question “what are our obligations?” is equivalentto thinking about what is to be done; on the other hand, they def...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| Repositório: | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/59575 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59575 http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.181 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Alchourrón-bulygin Ethical relativism Ethical constructivism Burdenof proof Particularism |
| id |
ES_ff87c3f9eebe22b50bf85b9cbdc3854a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/59575 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
On deontic truth and valuesMoreso, Josep JoanAlchourrón-bulyginEthical relativismEthical constructivismBurdenof proofParticularismThis article analyzes the thesis of ethical relativism, as defended byAlchourrón and Bulygin (1983). These authors offer, on the one hand, a suggestiveconception according to which the question “what are our obligations?” is equivalentto thinking about what is to be done; on the other hand, they defend a relativistconception of ethics. They present three objections to constructivist accounts ofethics that are not relativist: a) the argument of the burden of theproof; b) aversion of the dilemma of Euthyphro, and c) the argument of particularism. Thisarticle presents counterarguments to these objections in the attempt to show thatthey are not conclusive and that a space therefore remains for objectivity in thenormative sphere.202420242017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/59575http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.181reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésCrítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía. 2017 Oct 31;49(146):61-74Crítica, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/595752026-06-12T07:21:37Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On deontic truth and values |
| title |
On deontic truth and values |
| spellingShingle |
On deontic truth and values Moreso, Josep Joan Alchourrón-bulygin Ethical relativism Ethical constructivism Burdenof proof Particularism |
| title_short |
On deontic truth and values |
| title_full |
On deontic truth and values |
| title_fullStr |
On deontic truth and values |
| title_full_unstemmed |
On deontic truth and values |
| title_sort |
On deontic truth and values |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Moreso, Josep Joan |
| author |
Moreso, Josep Joan |
| author_facet |
Moreso, Josep Joan |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Alchourrón-bulygin Ethical relativism Ethical constructivism Burdenof proof Particularism |
| topic |
Alchourrón-bulygin Ethical relativism Ethical constructivism Burdenof proof Particularism |
| description |
This article analyzes the thesis of ethical relativism, as defended byAlchourrón and Bulygin (1983). These authors offer, on the one hand, a suggestiveconception according to which the question “what are our obligations?” is equivalentto thinking about what is to be done; on the other hand, they defend a relativistconception of ethics. They present three objections to constructivist accounts ofethics that are not relativist: a) the argument of the burden of theproof; b) aversion of the dilemma of Euthyphro, and c) the argument of particularism. Thisarticle presents counterarguments to these objections in the attempt to show thatthey are not conclusive and that a space therefore remains for objectivity in thenormative sphere. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2024 2024 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59575 http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.181 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59575 http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2017.181 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía. 2017 Oct 31;49(146):61-74 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| instname_str |
Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| reponame_str |
Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869425782456057856 |
| score |
15,811543 |