Wait, But Why? Challenging the Intuitive Force of Substance Dualism

In responding to Joshua Farris’ The Soul of Theological Anthropology, I suggest several reasons for questioning the theological need for substance dualism in any form. Specifically, I argue that it is not at the level of analytic argumentation that the mind or soul is best understood, and that the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Ritchie, S.L. (Sarah Lane)|||/items/a8afc669-3ad8-45cf-b64b-634edfb11ec0
Format: article
Publication Date:2021
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Navarra
Repository:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/62548
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/62548
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:physicalism
intuition
mind
soul
body
dualism
Description
Summary:In responding to Joshua Farris’ The Soul of Theological Anthropology, I suggest several reasons for questioning the theological need for substance dualism in any form. Specifically, I argue that it is not at the level of analytic argumentation that the mind or soul is best understood, and that the sciences do indeed challenge substance dualism (despite philosophical arguments to the contrary). In making this argument, I examine the roles of intuition and theological pre-commitments in one’s determination of the correct understanding of the mind or soul. I suggest that dualism is not only theolog-ically unnecessary, but also an intuition that we have reason to question.