A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study

Background: The clinical and economic management of retinal diseases has become more complex following the introduction of new intravitreal treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers the potential to overcome the challenges associated with traditional decision-making tools. Objectives...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: de Andrés-Nogales, Fernando, Casado, Miguel Angel, Trillo, José Luis, Ruiz-Moreno, José María, Martínez-Sesmero, José Manuel, Peralta, Gemma, Poveda, José Luis, Ortiz Sagrista, Pere, Ignacio, Emilio, Zarranz-Ventura, Javier, Udaondo, Patricia, Mur, Carlos, Álvarez, Eloísa, Cervera, Enrique, Martínez, Mercedes, Llorente, Iñaki, Zulueta, Jacinto, Rodríguez-Maqueda, Mariano, García-Layana, Alfredo, Martínez-Olmos, José
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2020
Country:España
Institution:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repository:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/47249
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/47249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00201-2
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Edema macular diabètic
Ulls--Malalties
Retina
id ES_fca8f67467fdef6bb8b890df10d0281a
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10230/47249
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
title A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
spellingShingle A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
de Andrés-Nogales, Fernando
Edema macular diabètic
Ulls--Malalties
Retina
title_short A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
title_full A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
title_fullStr A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
title_full_unstemmed A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
title_sort A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv de Andrés-Nogales, Fernando
Casado, Miguel Angel
Trillo, José Luis
Ruiz-Moreno, José María
Martínez-Sesmero, José Manuel
Peralta, Gemma
Poveda, José Luis
Ortiz Sagrista, Pere
Ignacio, Emilio
Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
Udaondo, Patricia
Mur, Carlos
Álvarez, Eloísa
Cervera, Enrique
Martínez, Mercedes
Llorente, Iñaki
Zulueta, Jacinto
Rodríguez-Maqueda, Mariano
García-Layana, Alfredo
Martínez-Olmos, José
author de Andrés-Nogales, Fernando
author_facet de Andrés-Nogales, Fernando
Casado, Miguel Angel
Trillo, José Luis
Ruiz-Moreno, José María
Martínez-Sesmero, José Manuel
Peralta, Gemma
Poveda, José Luis
Ortiz Sagrista, Pere
Ignacio, Emilio
Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
Udaondo, Patricia
Mur, Carlos
Álvarez, Eloísa
Cervera, Enrique
Martínez, Mercedes
Llorente, Iñaki
Zulueta, Jacinto
Rodríguez-Maqueda, Mariano
García-Layana, Alfredo
Martínez-Olmos, José
author_role author
author2 Casado, Miguel Angel
Trillo, José Luis
Ruiz-Moreno, José María
Martínez-Sesmero, José Manuel
Peralta, Gemma
Poveda, José Luis
Ortiz Sagrista, Pere
Ignacio, Emilio
Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
Udaondo, Patricia
Mur, Carlos
Álvarez, Eloísa
Cervera, Enrique
Martínez, Mercedes
Llorente, Iñaki
Zulueta, Jacinto
Rodríguez-Maqueda, Mariano
García-Layana, Alfredo
Martínez-Olmos, José
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Edema macular diabètic
Ulls--Malalties
Retina
topic Edema macular diabètic
Ulls--Malalties
Retina
description Background: The clinical and economic management of retinal diseases has become more complex following the introduction of new intravitreal treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers the potential to overcome the challenges associated with traditional decision-making tools. Objectives: A MCDA to determine the most relevant criteria to decision-making in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in Spain was developed. This MCDA was termed the MULTIDEX-EMD study. Methods: Nineteen stakeholders (7 physicians, 4 pharmacists, 5 health authorities and health management experts, 1 psychologist, and 2 patient representatives) participated in this three-phase project. In phase A, an advisory board defined all of the criteria that could influence DME treatment decision-making. These criteria were then screened using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) (phase B). Next, a multinomial logit model was fitted by applying the backward elimination algorithm (relevant criteria: p value < 0.05). Finally, the results were discussed in a deliberative process (phase C). Results: Thirty-one criteria were initially defined (phase A) and grouped into 5 categories: efficacy/effectiveness, safety, organizational and economic impact, patient-reported outcomes, and other therapeutic features. The DCE results (phase B) showed that 10 criteria were relevant to the decision-making process for a 50- to 65-year-old DME patient: mean change in best corrected visual acuity (p value < 0.001), percentage of patients with an improvement of ≥ 15 letters (p value < 0.001), effect duration per administration (p value = 0.008), retinal detachment (p value < 0.001), endophthalmitis (p value = 0.012), myocardial infarction (p value < 0.001), intravitreal hemorrhage (p value = 0.021), annual treatment cost per patient (p value = 0.001), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p value = 0.004), and disability level (p value = 0.021). Conclusions: From a multi-stakeholder perspective, the selection of an appropriate treatment for DME patients should guarantee patient safety and maximize the visual acuity improvement and treatment effect duration. It should also contribute to system sustainability by being affordable, it should have a positive impact on HRQoL, and it should prevent disability.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2021
2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/47249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00201-2
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/47249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00201-2
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SpringerOpen
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SpringerOpen
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869425442803417088
spelling A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: the MULTIDEX-EMD studyde Andrés-Nogales, FernandoCasado, Miguel AngelTrillo, José LuisRuiz-Moreno, José MaríaMartínez-Sesmero, José ManuelPeralta, GemmaPoveda, José LuisOrtiz Sagrista, PereIgnacio, EmilioZarranz-Ventura, JavierUdaondo, PatriciaMur, CarlosÁlvarez, EloísaCervera, EnriqueMartínez, MercedesLlorente, IñakiZulueta, JacintoRodríguez-Maqueda, MarianoGarcía-Layana, AlfredoMartínez-Olmos, JoséEdema macular diabèticUlls--MalaltiesRetinaBackground: The clinical and economic management of retinal diseases has become more complex following the introduction of new intravitreal treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers the potential to overcome the challenges associated with traditional decision-making tools. Objectives: A MCDA to determine the most relevant criteria to decision-making in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in Spain was developed. This MCDA was termed the MULTIDEX-EMD study. Methods: Nineteen stakeholders (7 physicians, 4 pharmacists, 5 health authorities and health management experts, 1 psychologist, and 2 patient representatives) participated in this three-phase project. In phase A, an advisory board defined all of the criteria that could influence DME treatment decision-making. These criteria were then screened using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) (phase B). Next, a multinomial logit model was fitted by applying the backward elimination algorithm (relevant criteria: p value < 0.05). Finally, the results were discussed in a deliberative process (phase C). Results: Thirty-one criteria were initially defined (phase A) and grouped into 5 categories: efficacy/effectiveness, safety, organizational and economic impact, patient-reported outcomes, and other therapeutic features. The DCE results (phase B) showed that 10 criteria were relevant to the decision-making process for a 50- to 65-year-old DME patient: mean change in best corrected visual acuity (p value < 0.001), percentage of patients with an improvement of ≥ 15 letters (p value < 0.001), effect duration per administration (p value = 0.008), retinal detachment (p value < 0.001), endophthalmitis (p value = 0.012), myocardial infarction (p value < 0.001), intravitreal hemorrhage (p value = 0.021), annual treatment cost per patient (p value = 0.001), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p value = 0.004), and disability level (p value = 0.021). Conclusions: From a multi-stakeholder perspective, the selection of an appropriate treatment for DME patients should guarantee patient safety and maximize the visual acuity improvement and treatment effect duration. It should also contribute to system sustainability by being affordable, it should have a positive impact on HRQoL, and it should prevent disability.SpringerOpen202120212020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/47249http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00201-2reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésCopyright © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/472492026-05-29T05:05:01Z
score 15,198674