Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Background: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. Methods: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous o...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:2445/178507 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/178507 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anticossos monoclonals Immunologia Esclerosi múltiple Monoclonal antibodies Immunology Multiple sclerosis |
| id |
ES_faa9364fa4be98f2b9ea9d305a32aa74 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:2445/178507 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple SclerosisHauser, Stephen L.Bar-Or, AmitComi, GiancarloGiovannoni, GavinHartung, Hans-PeterHemmer, BernhardLublin, FredMontalbán Gairín, XavierRammohan, Kottil W.Selmaj, KrzysztofTraboulsee, AnthonyWolinsky, Jerry S.Arnold, Douglas L.Klingelschmitt, GaelleMasterman, DonnaFontoura, PauloBelachew, ShibeshihChin, PeterMairon, NicoleGarren, HidekiKappos, LudwigMartínez Yélamos, SergioOPERA IOPERA II Clinical InvestigatorsAnticossos monoclonalsImmunologiaEsclerosi múltipleMonoclonal antibodiesImmunologyMultiple sclerosisBackground: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. Methods: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a at a dose of 44 μg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Results: the annualized relapse rate was lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 46% lower rate with ocrelizumab; P<0.001) and in trial 2 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 47% lower rate; P<0.001). In prespecified pooled analyses, the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was significantly lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a (9.1% vs. 13.6%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.81; P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks (6.9% vs. 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P=0.003). The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper-limb movements, and cognition; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta-1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Conclusions: among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta-1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 , respectively).Massachusetts Medical Society2021202120172021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion14 p.application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/178507Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, vol. 376, num. 3, p. 221-234https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277(c) Massachusetts Medical Society, 2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1785072026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| title |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| spellingShingle |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Hauser, Stephen L. Anticossos monoclonals Immunologia Esclerosi múltiple Monoclonal antibodies Immunology Multiple sclerosis |
| title_short |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| title_full |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| title_fullStr |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| title_sort |
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hauser, Stephen L. Bar-Or, Amit Comi, Giancarlo Giovannoni, Gavin Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Lublin, Fred Montalbán Gairín, Xavier Rammohan, Kottil W. Selmaj, Krzysztof Traboulsee, Anthony Wolinsky, Jerry S. Arnold, Douglas L. Klingelschmitt, Gaelle Masterman, Donna Fontoura, Paulo Belachew, Shibeshih Chin, Peter Mairon, Nicole Garren, Hideki Kappos, Ludwig Martínez Yélamos, Sergio OPERA I OPERA II Clinical Investigators |
| author |
Hauser, Stephen L. |
| author_facet |
Hauser, Stephen L. Bar-Or, Amit Comi, Giancarlo Giovannoni, Gavin Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Lublin, Fred Montalbán Gairín, Xavier Rammohan, Kottil W. Selmaj, Krzysztof Traboulsee, Anthony Wolinsky, Jerry S. Arnold, Douglas L. Klingelschmitt, Gaelle Masterman, Donna Fontoura, Paulo Belachew, Shibeshih Chin, Peter Mairon, Nicole Garren, Hideki Kappos, Ludwig Martínez Yélamos, Sergio OPERA I OPERA II Clinical Investigators |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Bar-Or, Amit Comi, Giancarlo Giovannoni, Gavin Hartung, Hans-Peter Hemmer, Bernhard Lublin, Fred Montalbán Gairín, Xavier Rammohan, Kottil W. Selmaj, Krzysztof Traboulsee, Anthony Wolinsky, Jerry S. Arnold, Douglas L. Klingelschmitt, Gaelle Masterman, Donna Fontoura, Paulo Belachew, Shibeshih Chin, Peter Mairon, Nicole Garren, Hideki Kappos, Ludwig Martínez Yélamos, Sergio OPERA I OPERA II Clinical Investigators |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Anticossos monoclonals Immunologia Esclerosi múltiple Monoclonal antibodies Immunology Multiple sclerosis |
| topic |
Anticossos monoclonals Immunologia Esclerosi múltiple Monoclonal antibodies Immunology Multiple sclerosis |
| description |
Background: B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. Methods: In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a at a dose of 44 μg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. Results: the annualized relapse rate was lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 46% lower rate with ocrelizumab; P<0.001) and in trial 2 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 47% lower rate; P<0.001). In prespecified pooled analyses, the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was significantly lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta-1a (9.1% vs. 13.6%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.81; P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks (6.9% vs. 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P=0.003). The mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions per T1-weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta-1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper-limb movements, and cognition; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta-1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta-1a. Conclusions: among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta-1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 , respectively). |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2021 2021 2021 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/178507 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/178507 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277 New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, vol. 376, num. 3, p. 221-234 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
(c) Massachusetts Medical Society, 2017 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
(c) Massachusetts Medical Society, 2017 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
14 p. application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Massachusetts Medical Society |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Massachusetts Medical Society |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Articles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques) reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869425231587704832 |
| score |
15,81155 |