Driving Offences and Emotion Regulation: A Psychometric Analysis of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)

[EN]Background: Little is known about the role of emotion regulation in driving. This study analyzed the psychometric properties of one of the most commonly-used tests for the evaluation of emotion regulation in a drivers’ sample. Methods: A total of 318 male drivers (M age = 41.6 years, SD = 11.1,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pérez‑Sánchez, Jennifer, Delgado González, Ana Rosa, Prieto Adánez, Gerardo Alfonso
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositorio:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/153561
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/153561
https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.120
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Emotion regulation
ERQ
Rasch Model
Rating Scale Model
Traffic psychology
Regulación emocional
Modelo de Rasch
Modelo de escalas de calificación
Psicología del tráfico
Emotional Intelligence
Psychometrics
6105.05 Psicometría
6105.09 Validez de Tests
Descripción
Sumario:[EN]Background: Little is known about the role of emotion regulation in driving. This study analyzed the psychometric properties of one of the most commonly-used tests for the evaluation of emotion regulation in a drivers’ sample. Methods: A total of 318 male drivers (M age = 41.6 years, SD = 11.1, age range 20-69 years, half with road traffic offences and half, matched controls), participated in the study by filling out the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Data analysis was carried out using the Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM). Results: The performance of the response categories was inadequate. After collapsing the seven original response categories into three, the categories were functional, the unidimensionality requirement was met, and data-model fit was adequate. Both person reliability and item reliability were adequate for the two subscales of ERQ. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the cognitive reappraisal subscale. Conclusions: Given the adequate psychometric properties of the ERQ, it is suggested that the role of cognitive reappraisal in driving contexts be explored in depth.