Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation in cognition and brain networks: a randomised clinical trial in patients with multiple sclerosis
This study evaluated the efficacy of the computerised Guttmann, NeuroPersonalTrainer® (GNPT) cognitive rehabilitation (CR) and characterised the induced changes in cerebral networks in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial compared upward in...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:rdupf_______::b96e2f0e2c825c187c72a98a91193c96 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10230/73239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103775 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Cognition Cognitive rehabilitation MRI Multiple sclerosis Structural networks |
| Sumario: | This study evaluated the efficacy of the computerised Guttmann, NeuroPersonalTrainer® (GNPT) cognitive rehabilitation (CR) and characterised the induced changes in cerebral networks in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial compared upward intensity training (active treatment) to low-intensity static training (static treatment). Cognition was assessed using the Brief Repeatable battery before and after 12 weeks of training and at 10-months follow-up, and patients were classified as having a mild or severe cognitive impairment (CI). Brain MRI pre- and post-CR were analysed using an advanced tractography algorithm, based on multishell diffusion MRI, to obtain node-based graph metrics (local efficiency and strength) from microscopic fractional anisotropy. Seventy MS patients completed the study (age 48.9 ± 8.8, disease duration 16.8 ± 9.0 years); active treatment: 36, static treatment: 34. Verbal memory improved significantly post-CR in both groups (55 % active; 34 % static treatment), accompanied by increases in local efficiency and strength in multimodal regions. At follow-up, verbal memory declined in both groups but remained above the pre-CR assessment (-25 % and -17 %, respectively). Patients with severe-CI (n = 36) showed improvement only with active treatment, while those with mild-CI (n = 34) improved regardless of intensity treatment. Network changes were more pronounced in patients in active treatment and in those with severe-CI. Quality of life did not change at post-CR, and cognitive improvement was influenced by cognitive reserve (p = 0.011). In MS, GNPT temporarily improves verbal memory and increases network connectivity, reinforcing the CR as a valuable tool for enhancing cognitive skills and promoting neuronal plasticity. |
|---|