People with psychosis improve affective social cognition and self-care after a mindfulness-based social cognition training program (SocialMIND)
Objective: This study explores whether social cognition and social functioning improve after a mindfulness-based social cognition training (SocialMIND). Methods: Thirty-eight outpatients with psychosis completed an assessment with social cognition (Eyes Test, Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Quest...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid |
| Repositorio: | Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/726500 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10486/726500 https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/prj0000466 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | psychosis mindfulness social cognition self-care social functioning Medicina |
| Sumario: | Objective: This study explores whether social cognition and social functioning improve after a mindfulness-based social cognition training (SocialMIND). Methods: Thirty-eight outpatients with psychosis completed an assessment with social cognition (Eyes Test, Ambiguous Intentions and Hostility Questionnaire [AIHQ], and Hinting Task) and social functioning tasks (Personal and Social Performance [PSP] scale) before and after eight SocialMIND weekly sessions. Mean differences between timepoints were standardized and 95% confidence intervals were obtained with a paired samples t-test. Results: The scores of the Eyes Test (95% CI [.43, 3.32], d = .48), the Hostility Bias subscale (AIHQ) (95% CI [–.29, –.01], d = .44), and the self-care difficulties subscale (PSP) (95% CI [–.77, –.09], d = .45) improved after the intervention. Conclusions: and Implications for practice: The results of SocialMIND-8 are very promising in terms of developing comprehensive rehabilitation programs. Further trials must address its effectiveness against a control group during longer follow-up periods |
|---|