Synchronization, information, and brain dynamics in consciousness research
Understanding consciousness requires bridging theoretical models and clinically measurable brain dynamics. This review integrates three complementary frameworks that converge on a dynamical view of conscious processing: continuous formulations of Integrated Information Theory (IIT), attractor-landsc...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:idus________::4c5f58f08108ce239e727e5f5e82dcee |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/185632 https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021056 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Attractor landscapes Brain dynamics Consciousness Integrated information theory Perturbational complexity |
| Sumario: | Understanding consciousness requires bridging theoretical models and clinically measurable brain dynamics. This review integrates three complementary frameworks that converge on a dynamical view of conscious processing: continuous formulations of Integrated Information Theory (IIT), attractor-landscape modeling of brain-state transitions, and perturbational complexity metrics from transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). Continuous-time IIT formalizes how integrated information evolves across temporal hierarchies, while dynamical-systems approaches show that consciousness emerges near criticality, where metastable attractors enable flexible transitions between partially synchronized states. Perturbational-complexity indices capture these properties empirically, quantifying the brain’s capacity for integration and differentiation even without behavioral responsiveness. Across anesthesia, disorders of consciousness, epilepsy, and neurodegeneration, TMS-EEG biomarkers reveal reduced complexity and altered synchronization consistent with structural and functional disconnection. Integrating multimodal data—diffusion MRI, fMRI, EEG, and causal perturbations—is consistent with individualized modeling of consciousness-related dynamics. Standardized protocols, mechanistically interpretable machine learning, and longitudinal validation are essential for clinical translation. By uniting information-theoretic, dynamical, and empirical perspectives, this framework offers a reproducible foundation for consciousness biomarkers that mechanistically link brain dynamics to subjective experience, paving the way for precision applications in neurology, psychiatry, and anesthesia. |
|---|