Five years of PCK summit, what has endured
Trying to understand teacher's professional knowledge, Shulman has popularised the Pedagogical Content Knowledge, from then on several models were proposed. To minimise such differences the PCK Summit was held aiming to develop a single model to unify the field. However, five years has passed a...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:184589 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/184589 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Factorial analysis of correspondence PCK summit |
| Sumario: | Trying to understand teacher's professional knowledge, Shulman has popularised the Pedagogical Content Knowledge, from then on several models were proposed. To minimise such differences the PCK Summit was held aiming to develop a single model to unify the field. However, five years has passed and none of the researchers present at the event has adopted the Consensus Model, leaving a question of its impact on them. To access it, a lexicometric analysis of the papers published before and after the Summit was performed, being presented here the factorial analysis of correspondence, which has shown that the questions of the papers published before lead to the main questions of the event, and were solved in it, changing the subject of interest of the researchers. Another important aspect is that the discourse of the researchers put in the same work group in the Summit became more similar after it, showing that the Summit exert some effect on the researchers. |
|---|