Il Regolamento europeo sull’intelligenza artificiale: una regolazione più apocalittica o più integrata?
In this article, we analyse whether the legal outcome of the negotiation process has resulted in, to paraphrase Umberto Eco, a more apocalyptic or more integrated regulation. The ‘more apocalyptic regulation’ refers to one that prioritizes the defence of fundamental rights against the threats posed...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI) |
| Repositorio: | RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo |
| Idioma: | indefinido |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:ruo_________::9337a907377666d3b39c91cdd5044015 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10651/83658 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Unión Europea derechos fundamentales, inteligencia artificial, reglamento europeo de inteligencia artificial |
| Sumario: | In this article, we analyse whether the legal outcome of the negotiation process has resulted in, to paraphrase Umberto Eco, a more apocalyptic or more integrated regulation. The ‘more apocalyptic regulation’ refers to one that prioritizes the defence of fundamental rights against the threats posed to our freedoms by modern artificial intelligence systems. ‘More integrated regulation’ refers to one that explicitly acknowledges that excessive legal obstacles should not be imposed on innovation and technological development and that we must accept certain levels of risk as the price to be paid for the advantages offered by artificial intelligence systems. |
|---|