Precisión en el concepto de embrión humano a efectos del derecho de patentes. La exclusión del partenote
The Court of Justice of the European Union, qualifying the judgment Brüstle, has determined that parthenotes are not human embryos for the purpose of patent law. The fundamental argument is handled in the previous sentence erroneous technical data on the chances of an egg is handled activated by par...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/24081 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24081 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 347.77/.78 Embrión humano dignidad humana Partenogénesis patente aprovechamiento industrial. Human embryo human dignity Parthenogenesis patent industrial use. Propiedad intelectual Unión Europea (Derecho) |
| Sumario: | The Court of Justice of the European Union, qualifying the judgment Brüstle, has determined that parthenotes are not human embryos for the purpose of patent law. The fundamental argument is handled in the previous sentence erroneous technical data on the chances of an egg is handled activated by parthenogenesis of becoming a human being. |
|---|