"Hegemonía" y "nacional-popular", dos categorías gramscianas adulteradas por la teoría populista
[EN] The use and abuse by the populist theory (Laclau, Mouffe, Errejón) of Antonio Gramsci’s philosophy has led to an erosion, deformation and falsification of a large part of his concepts, subjected to a postmodern mirror game. In this article we would like to show how the populist interpretation o...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/220493 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/220493 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Gramsci Populism Marxism Hegemony National-popular Populismo Marxismo Hegemonía Nacional-popular |
| Sumario: | [EN] The use and abuse by the populist theory (Laclau, Mouffe, Errejón) of Antonio Gramsci’s philosophy has led to an erosion, deformation and falsification of a large part of his concepts, subjected to a postmodern mirror game. In this article we would like to show how the populist interpretation of two central categories of Gramscian thought, “hegemony” and “national-popular”, is a good example of this. The main threads that we will follow will be the disconnection with its Leninist matrix, the political emptying of his ideas and an idealistic reductionism |
|---|