Coordination of contexts and taste disagreements
In this paper, I will defend that there is an asymmetry between straightforwardly factual and non-straightforwardly factual disagreements (Field 2009) in terms of persistency and retraction and that we can use what I will call ‘coordination of contexts’ to explain these two asymmetries. To make my p...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Murcia |
| Repositorio: | DIGITUM. Depósito Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digitum.um.es:10201/92245 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.332591 http://hdl.handle.net/10201/92245 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Disagreement about Taste Disagreement Kinematics Non-straightforwardly Factual Disagreements Coordination of Contexts Retraction Desacuerdos de Gusto Cinemática del Desacuerdo Desacuerdos No Directamente Factuales Coordinación de Contextos Retractación CDU::1 - Filosofía y psicología |
| Sumario: | In this paper, I will defend that there is an asymmetry between straightforwardly factual and non-straightforwardly factual disagreements (Field 2009) in terms of persistency and retraction and that we can use what I will call ‘coordination of contexts’ to explain these two asymmetries. To make my point, I will focus on the kinematics of this type of disagreements. I will argue that one way to give a proper account of the kinematics of taste disagreements and to discriminate between straightforwardly factual and non-straightforwardly factual disagreements is to focus on coordination of contexts. |
|---|