Coordination of contexts and taste disagreements
In this paper, I will defend that there is an asymmetry between straightforwardly factual and non-straightforwardly factual disagreements (Field 2009) in terms of persistency and retraction and that we can use what I will call ‘coordination of contexts’ to explain these two asymmetries. To make my p...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/98208 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/98208 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | 81:1 Disagreement about taste Disagreement kinematics Non-straightforwardly factual disagreements Coordination of contexts Retraction Desacuerdos de gusto Cinemática del desacuerdo Desacuerdos no directamente factuales Coordinación de contextos Retractación Filosofía 72 Filosofía 7299 Otras Especialidades Filosóficas 7202.07 Filosofía del Lenguaje |
| Resumo: | In this paper, I will defend that there is an asymmetry between straightforwardly factual and non-straightforwardly factual disagreements (Field 2009) in terms of persistency and retraction and that we can use what I will call ‘coordination of contexts’ to explain these two asymmetries. To make my point, I will focus on the kinematics of this type of disagreements. I will argue that one way to give a proper account of the kinematics of taste disagreements and to discriminate between straightforwardly factual and non-straightforwardly factual disagreements is to focus on coordination of contexts. |
|---|