Crítica al ilusionismo y defensa de la plurifocalidad. La influencia de Platón
[EN] In general, there are two ways to account for reality: tragically or epically. Plato criticized the first one and applauded the second one. To these forms correspond two modes of representation in perspective: conical or illusionist, and axonometric or reflective. We propose to remark that, unl...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/201285 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/201285 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Axonometry Plato Objectivity Illusionism Axonometría Platón Objetividad Ilusionismo |
| Sumario: | [EN] In general, there are two ways to account for reality: tragically or epically. Plato criticized the first one and applauded the second one. To these forms correspond two modes of representation in perspective: conical or illusionist, and axonometric or reflective. We propose to remark that, unlike some illusionist authors of the Renaissance and Baroque, certain artists of twentieth-century Modernity opted for the epic representation of reality, whose plurifocal objectivity guarantees axonometry. |
|---|