Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics
Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) are cost-effective, flexible and offer a wide range of applications. If equipped with optical sensors, orthophotos with very high spatial resolution can be retrieved using photogrammetric processing. The use of these images in multi-temporal analysis and the combination...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/225630 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/225630 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Unmanned aerial systems Unmanned aerial vehicles Time series Accuracy Reproducibility Orthomosaic Validation Photogrammetry |
| id |
ES_d48239cf46e7d8eee4e49aa942a73b85 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/225630 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS OrthomosaicsLudwig, MarvinRunge, Cristian MestreFriess, NicolasKoch, Tiziana L.Richter, SebastianSeyfried, SimonWraase, LuiseLobo, AgustínSebastià, María TeresaReudenbach, ChristophNauss, ThomasUnmanned aerial systemsUnmanned aerial vehiclesTime seriesAccuracyReproducibilityOrthomosaicValidationPhotogrammetryUnmanned aerial systems (UAS) are cost-effective, flexible and offer a wide range of applications. If equipped with optical sensors, orthophotos with very high spatial resolution can be retrieved using photogrammetric processing. The use of these images in multi-temporal analysis and the combination with spatial data imposes high demands on their spatial accuracy. This georeferencing accuracy of UAS orthomosaics is generally expressed as the checkpoint error. However, the checkpoint error alone gives no information about the reproducibility of the photogrammetrical compilation of orthomosaics. This study optimizes the geolocation of UAS orthomosaics time series and evaluates their reproducibility. A correlation analysis of repeatedly computed orthomosaics with identical parameters revealed a reproducibility of 99% in a grassland and 75% in a forest area. Between time steps, the corresponding positional errors of digitized objects lie between 0.07 m in the grassland and 0.3 m in the forest canopy. The novel methods were integrated into a processing workflow to enhance the traceability and increase the quality of UAS remote sensing.This research was funded by the Hessian State Ministry for Higher Education, Research and the Arts, Germany, as part of the LOEWE priority project Nature 4.0—Sensing Biodiversity. The grassland study was funded by the Spanish Science Foundation FECYT-MINECO through the BIOGEI (GL2013- 49142-C2-1-R) and IMAGINE (CGL2017-85490-R) projects, and by the University of Lleida; and supported by a FI Fellowship to C.M.R. (2019 FI_B 01167) by the Catalan Government.Peer reviewedMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing InstituteHessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the ArtsMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)Generalitat de CatalunyaUniversidad de LleidaConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]2020202020202020info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/225630reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/GL2013- 49142-C2-1-RSíinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/2256302026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| title |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| spellingShingle |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics Ludwig, Marvin Unmanned aerial systems Unmanned aerial vehicles Time series Accuracy Reproducibility Orthomosaic Validation Photogrammetry |
| title_short |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| title_full |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| title_fullStr |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| title_sort |
Quality Assessment of Photogrammetric Methods—A Workflow for Reproducible UAS Orthomosaics |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ludwig, Marvin Runge, Cristian Mestre Friess, Nicolas Koch, Tiziana L. Richter, Sebastian Seyfried, Simon Wraase, Luise Lobo, Agustín Sebastià, María Teresa Reudenbach, Christoph Nauss, Thomas |
| author |
Ludwig, Marvin |
| author_facet |
Ludwig, Marvin Runge, Cristian Mestre Friess, Nicolas Koch, Tiziana L. Richter, Sebastian Seyfried, Simon Wraase, Luise Lobo, Agustín Sebastià, María Teresa Reudenbach, Christoph Nauss, Thomas |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Runge, Cristian Mestre Friess, Nicolas Koch, Tiziana L. Richter, Sebastian Seyfried, Simon Wraase, Luise Lobo, Agustín Sebastià, María Teresa Reudenbach, Christoph Nauss, Thomas |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Hessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) Generalitat de Catalunya Universidad de Lleida Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Unmanned aerial systems Unmanned aerial vehicles Time series Accuracy Reproducibility Orthomosaic Validation Photogrammetry |
| topic |
Unmanned aerial systems Unmanned aerial vehicles Time series Accuracy Reproducibility Orthomosaic Validation Photogrammetry |
| description |
Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) are cost-effective, flexible and offer a wide range of applications. If equipped with optical sensors, orthophotos with very high spatial resolution can be retrieved using photogrammetric processing. The use of these images in multi-temporal analysis and the combination with spatial data imposes high demands on their spatial accuracy. This georeferencing accuracy of UAS orthomosaics is generally expressed as the checkpoint error. However, the checkpoint error alone gives no information about the reproducibility of the photogrammetrical compilation of orthomosaics. This study optimizes the geolocation of UAS orthomosaics time series and evaluates their reproducibility. A correlation analysis of repeatedly computed orthomosaics with identical parameters revealed a reproducibility of 99% in a grassland and 75% in a forest area. Between time steps, the corresponding positional errors of digitized objects lie between 0.07 m in the grassland and 0.3 m in the forest canopy. The novel methods were integrated into a processing workflow to enhance the traceability and increase the quality of UAS remote sensing. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2020 2020 2020 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Publisher's version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/225630 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/225630 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/GL2013- 49142-C2-1-R Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869420553226420224 |
| score |
15,811543 |