Benefits and drawbacks of integrating a side-stream sludge fermenter into an A2O system under limited COD conditions
The implementation of a side-stream sludge fermenter (SSSF) has been identified as a possible solution to improve the performance of an anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O) configuration when treating low COD wastewater. This study systematically evaluated the effects of incorporating a SSSF into an A2O c...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:281236 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/281236 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.143700 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (AO) COD limitation Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) Side-stream enhanced biological phosphorus removal (S2EBPR) Side-stream sludge fermenter (SSSF) |
| Sumario: | The implementation of a side-stream sludge fermenter (SSSF) has been identified as a possible solution to improve the performance of an anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O) configuration when treating low COD wastewater. This study systematically evaluated the effects of incorporating a SSSF into an A2O configuration (side-stream enhanced biological phosphorus removal, S2EBPR) for P/N/COD removal under a limited influent COD (CODINF) condition. The performance of the S2EBPR (with the SSSF receiving 6% of the recycled activated sludge and operating with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 2.4 d) and A2O were compared under the same limited CODINF (350 mg/L) condition. S2EBPR improved the amount of P removed (26.6%) under a low influent COD/P of only 26.3 compared with A2O of 32.6, and enhanced denitrification (11%) without compromising full ammonium and COD removal. However, the PLOAD to the plant increased due to the P-release in SSSF, resulting in higher effluent P concentration. The methane and energy recovery indexes were around 45% lower than those of A2O. Sequencing analysis revealed a high abundance of PAO in accordance to its higher P removal. This study represents a comprehensive evaluation of the S2EBPR configuration and provides an assessment of its suitability. |
|---|