La doble instancia en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa y el principio de inmediación: una deferencia mal entendida al juzgador de primera instancia
There is a certain consensus in administrative doctrine about the advisability of introducing a generalized second instance in the administrative litigation process. A broad conception of the second instance requires openness to the review of both the legal and factual aspects of the judicial reason...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/25024 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/25024 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Recurs contenciós administratiu Administrative courts Dret -- Metodologia Law -- Methodology Prova (Dret) Evidence (Law) |
| Sumario: | There is a certain consensus in administrative doctrine about the advisability of introducing a generalized second instance in the administrative litigation process. A broad conception of the second instance requires openness to the review of both the legal and factual aspects of the judicial reasoning of the first instance judgment. However, for this to be possible, it is necessary to abandon the subjectivist conception of evidence and proof, which is currently the majority view in administra-tive case law, and to give the principle of immediacy the appropriate content, in accordance with the rational conception of evidence and proof |
|---|