El control de la valoración de la prueba en segunda instancia: inmediación e inferencias probatorias
The review of the assessment of evidence in appellate court decisions: immediacy and evidentiary inferences | In this article, the author analyses the relation between the principle of immediacy and the review of evidential reasoning at the appellate level. He demonstrates the scope of review over t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/15096 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/15096 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dret processal Procedure (Law) Prova (Dret) Evidence (Law) |
| Sumario: | The review of the assessment of evidence in appellate court decisions: immediacy and evidentiary inferences | In this article, the author analyses the relation between the principle of immediacy and the review of evidential reasoning at the appellate level. He demonstrates the scope of review over the quality of evidential reasoning that can be realized without it affecting the principle of immediacy – appropriately understood. For this purpose, he examines a first level criminal court decision, indicating the different steps in its reasoning regarding the facts of the case and showing how its shortcomings can be reviewed |
|---|