Ni «Hombre del diablo», ni «Hombre de Dios»: Quevedo o «l’Homme des Lettres»
The present reflection begins from the reception that René Bouvier had about the work by Francisco de Quevedo y Villegas, categorizing it as «Homme du diable, Homme de Dieu». This work is based on the postulate of a writer coherent from ethical perspectives, and pragmatic from aesthetic experiments...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/66578 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/66578 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Quevedo ideología literatura |
| Sumario: | The present reflection begins from the reception that René Bouvier had about the work by Francisco de Quevedo y Villegas, categorizing it as «Homme du diable, Homme de Dieu». This work is based on the postulate of a writer coherent from ethical perspectives, and pragmatic from aesthetic experiments and innovations. The goal of this article is, without separating the philosophical-moral aspect of fictional work —whether poetic or prose—, to demonstrate that Quevedo can not be described either as «Homme de Dieu» nor «Homme du diable». Who, then, is Quevedo, from the perspective of a critic of the 21st century? |
|---|