Six weeks of HIIT based on repeated 5-meter sprints vs. countermovement jumps: effects on physical performance among karate athletes. A pilot-study
Background. The kumite section or karate kumite is characterized by high-intensity activity, including explosive actions. Problem and Aim. Determine the magnitude of the effect on the physical performance of karate athletes of the application of two protocols: HIIT-SPRINT and HIIT-JUMP performed at...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/28084 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10578/28084 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Combat sports Martial Arts Physical conditioning Performance |
| Sumario: | Background. The kumite section or karate kumite is characterized by high-intensity activity, including explosive actions. Problem and Aim. Determine the magnitude of the effect on the physical performance of karate athletes of the application of two protocols: HIIT-SPRINT and HIIT-JUMP performed at the beginning of a training session (20 minutes) for six weeks. Methods. Both the HIIT-JUMP and HIIT-SPRINT group underwent a six-week HIIT program, while the CONTROL group continued with their regular karate training. The athletes performed the following tests: squat jump, countermovement jump, 5m and 10m line speed, change of direction, aerobic capacity and body composition. Results. Fat mass (kg) decreased in the HIIT-JUMP group (ES = -0.63), while the HIIT-SPRINT group reduced the percent of body fat (ES = -0.85). Jump height for the squat and countermovement jumps increased in the HIIT-SPRINT group (ES = 0.82 and 0.94, respectively) and 10-m test (ES = -1.14) and change in direction (ES = -0.60) times were reduced. The HIIT-JUMP group decreased their times for the 5-m and 10-m tests (ES = -0.97 and -1.07, respectively). The HIIT SPRINT group improved in the 5-m test compared to the CONTROL group (ES = 0.62). Conclusions. These results suggest that both HIIT modalities offer specific adaptations, and could be considered as complementary to the training of athletes. |
|---|