Oculomotor dysfunction in idiopathic and LRRK2-parkinson's disease and at-risk individuals

Background: Video-oculography constitutes a highly-sensitive method of characterizing ocular movements, which could detect subtle premotor changes and contribute to the early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective: To investigate potential oculomotor differences between idiopathic PD...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Lage Martínez, Carmen, Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio, Rivera-Sánchez, María, Sierra Peña, María, González Aramburu, Isabel, Madera Fernández, Jorge, Delgado Alvarado, Manuel, López García, Sara, Martínez Dubarbie, Francisco, Fernández Matarrubia, Marta, Martínez-Amador, Néstor, Martínez Rodríguez, Mª Isabel, Calvo-Córdoba, Alberto, Rodríguez Rodríguez, Eloy Manuel, García-Cena, Cecilia, Sánchez-Juan, Pascual|||0000-0002-6081-8037, Infante Ceberio, Jon|||0000-0003-4025-4606
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Cantabria (UC)
Repositorio:UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unican.es:10902/33547
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10902/33547
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Parkinson's disease
LRRK2
Oculomotor
Early diagnosis
Premotor
Microsaccade
Antisaccade
Eye-tracking
Descrição
Resumo:Background: Video-oculography constitutes a highly-sensitive method of characterizing ocular movements, which could detect subtle premotor changes and contribute to the early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective: To investigate potential oculomotor differences between idiopathic PD (iPD) and PD associated with the G2019S variant of LRRK2 (L2PD), as well as to evaluate oculomotor function in asymptomatic carriers of the G2019S variant of LRRK2. Methods: The study enrolled 129 subjects: 30 PD (16 iPD, 14 L2PD), 23 asymptomatic carriers, 13 non-carrier relatives of L2PD patients, and 63 unrelated HCs. The video-oculographic evaluation included fixation, prosaccade, antisaccade, and memory saccade tests. Results: We did not find significant differences between iPD and L2PD. Compared to controls, PD patients displayed widespread oculomotor deficits including larger microsaccades, hypometric vertical prosaccades, increased latencies in all tests, and lower percentages of successful antisaccades and memory saccades. Non-carrier relatives showed oculomotor changes with parkinsonian features, such as fixation instability and hypometric vertical saccades. Asymptomatic carriers shared multiple similarities with PD, including signs of unstable fixation and hypometric vertical prosaccades; however, they were able to reach percentages of successful antisaccade and memory saccades similar to controls, although at the expense of longer latencies. Classification accuracy of significant oculomotor parameters to differentiate asymptomatic carriers from HCs ranged from 0.68 to 0.74, with BCEA, a marker of global fixation instability, being the parameter with the greatest classification accuracy. Conclusions: iPD and LRRK2-G2019S PD patients do not seem to display a differential oculomotor profile. Several oculomotor changes in asymptomatic carriers of LRRK2 mutations could be considered premotor biomarkers.