Predictors of a positive birth experience in childbirth: A cross-sectional study

Background: Recognizing predictors of positive birth experience is viewed as essential for minimizing negative experiences during childbirth that are related to current obstetric care, especially when those could be attributed to intrapartum interventions. The CEQ-E is a suitable instrument for inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Roqueta Vall-llosera, Marta, Cámara Liebana, David, Serrat Graboleda, Eva, Salleras Duran, Laia, Buxó Pujolràs, Maria, Fuentes Pumarola, Concepció, Ballester Ferrando, David
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10256/25414
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10256/25414
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Part
Llevadores
Obstetrícia
Parturition
Midwives
Obstetrics
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Recognizing predictors of positive birth experience is viewed as essential for minimizing negative experiences during childbirth that are related to current obstetric care, especially when those could be attributed to intrapartum interventions. The CEQ-E is a suitable instrument for investigating maternal birth experience within the Spanish population, highlighting the necessity to identify predictors for all its domains. This study aimed to identify predictors of positive birth experience based on socio-demographic and clinical variables, and obstetric interventions. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted with consecutive sampling (N = 301). Quantitative data were collected by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E) and an Ad hoc questionnaire. Clinical data was obtained from participants' medical records. Descriptive, bivariant and multivariant analysis were performed. Results: The CEQ overall mean score was 3.18(SD:0.42), showing the highest score for the professional support (3.79; SD: 0.43) and the lowest for the own capacity (2.8; SD:0.57). All domains and overall score showed negative correlations with the number of intrapartum interventions (p≤ .001). Inductions of labour, instrumental deliveries, and caesarean sections were inversely related to; overall birth experience score (p ≤ .001), perceived safety (p ≤ .001), and own capacity (p ≤ .001). Epidural analgesia was linked to worse values of birth experience (p ≤ .001). Predictors of positive birth experience were identified as having a midwife as birth attendant (p ≤ .001) and neonatal higher Apgar scores at birth (p ≤ .001), whereas higher maternal education grade (p = .04), inductions of labour (p ≤ .001) and caesarean births (p ≤ .001) had worse values on birth experience. Conclusion: Women reported a positive birth experience, and professional support was highly valued. Key predictors of lower scores in birth experience included higher maternal education, caesarean and instrumental deliveries, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Spontaneous labour onset predicted better capacity and safety. Epidural use decreased participation. Midwife-attended births reported better scores on birth experience, highlighting their importance in maternal care