Sellars vs. Grice on saying
[ENG] In this paper I argue that Sellars’ linguistic approach to conceptual abilities can provide notions of saying and what is said which are alternative to Grice’s and can be profitably employed as a pragmatist foundation for philosophical theories of language and especially for...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de las Islas Baleares |
| Repositorio: | Biblioteca Digital de les Illes Balears |
| OAI Identifier: | taula:Taula_2014v046p039 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://ibdigital.uib.es/greenstone/sites/oai-site/collect/taula/index/assoc/Taula_20/14v046p0/39.dir/Taula_2014v046p039.pdf http://ibdigital.uib.es/greenstone/library/collection/taula/document/Taula_2014v046p039 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Philosophy Sellars Linguistic Grice |
| Sumario: | [ENG] In this paper I argue that Sellars’ linguistic approach to conceptual abilities can provide notions of saying and what is said which are alternative to Grice’s and can be profitably employed as a pragmatist foundation for philosophical theories of language and especially for pragmatics. According to this alternative approach, linguistic activity –broadly understood in social terms–, and in particular certain episodes of rulegoverned verbal behavior, constitutes together the basic stratum of intentionality, conceptualization, and meaning. |
|---|