Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated

Prior research has shown that power is associated with cheating. In the present research,we showcase that higher power can increase but also decrease cheating,depending on the thoughts validated by the feelings of power. In two experiments,participants were first asked to generate either positive or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lamprinakos, Grigorios, Stavraki, Maria, Briñol, Pablo, Magrizos, Solon, Petty, Richard, Santos, David
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:IE
Repositorio:Repositorio IE
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/2997
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104578
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/2997
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180600149&doi=10.1016%2fj.jesp.2023.104578&partnerID=40&md5=8026e0473315a6e4f2467a08adcea759
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Adult
Controlled study
Female
Human
Human experiment
Male
Metacognition
Normal human
Self concept
Thinking
Cheating
Lying
Meta-Cognition
Power
Self-validation
61 Psicología::6106 Psicología experimental
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
id ES_c2eea68c5bfa4e0ce6922b5cffe466ae
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/2997
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validatedLamprinakos, GrigoriosStavraki, MariaBriñol, PabloMagrizos, SolonPetty, RichardSantos, DavidAdultControlled studyFemaleHumanHuman experimentMaleMetacognitionNormal humanSelf conceptThinkingCheatingLyingMeta-CognitionPowerSelf-validation61 Psicología::6106 Psicología experimentalODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidasPrior research has shown that power is associated with cheating. In the present research,we showcase that higher power can increase but also decrease cheating,depending on the thoughts validated by the feelings of power. In two experiments,participants were first asked to generate either positive or negative thoughts about cheating. Following this manipulation of thought direction,participants were placed in either high or low power conditions. After the two inductions,cheating was measured using different paradigms – assessing cheating intentions in relationships (Study 1) and over reporting performance for monetary gain (Study 2). Relative to powerless participants,those induced to feel powerful showed more reliance on the initial thoughts induced. Consequently,the effect of the direction of the thoughts on cheating was greater for participants with high (vs. low) power. Specifically,high power increased cheating only when initial thoughts about cheating were already favorable but decreased cheating when it validated unfavorable cheating relevant thoughts. © 2023 The AuthorsUniversity of Birmingham Grant numbers: C207.10006.61201. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion Grant numbers: PID2020-116651 GB-C31, PID2020-116651 GB-C32, PID2022-139380NA-I00.yesPublishedAcademic Press Inc.University of BirminghamAgencia Estatal de Investigaciónhttps://ror.org/02jjdwm75202420242024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104578https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/2997https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180600149&doi=10.1016%2fj.jesp.2023.104578&partnerID=40&md5=8026e0473315a6e4f2467a08adcea759reponame:Repositorio IEinstname:IEInglésIE Business SchoolPID2020-116651 GB-C31 PID2020-116651 GB-C32 PID2022-139380NA-I00IE UniversityHuman Resources & Organisational BehaviourAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/29972026-06-15T12:40:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
title Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
spellingShingle Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
Lamprinakos, Grigorios
Adult
Controlled study
Female
Human
Human experiment
Male
Metacognition
Normal human
Self concept
Thinking
Cheating
Lying
Meta-Cognition
Power
Self-validation
61 Psicología::6106 Psicología experimental
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
title_short Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
title_full Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
title_fullStr Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
title_full_unstemmed Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
title_sort Power can increase but also decrease cheating depending on what thoughts are validated
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lamprinakos, Grigorios
Stavraki, Maria
Briñol, Pablo
Magrizos, Solon
Petty, Richard
Santos, David
author Lamprinakos, Grigorios
author_facet Lamprinakos, Grigorios
Stavraki, Maria
Briñol, Pablo
Magrizos, Solon
Petty, Richard
Santos, David
author_role author
author2 Stavraki, Maria
Briñol, Pablo
Magrizos, Solon
Petty, Richard
Santos, David
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv University of Birmingham
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
https://ror.org/02jjdwm75
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Adult
Controlled study
Female
Human
Human experiment
Male
Metacognition
Normal human
Self concept
Thinking
Cheating
Lying
Meta-Cognition
Power
Self-validation
61 Psicología::6106 Psicología experimental
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
topic Adult
Controlled study
Female
Human
Human experiment
Male
Metacognition
Normal human
Self concept
Thinking
Cheating
Lying
Meta-Cognition
Power
Self-validation
61 Psicología::6106 Psicología experimental
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
description Prior research has shown that power is associated with cheating. In the present research,we showcase that higher power can increase but also decrease cheating,depending on the thoughts validated by the feelings of power. In two experiments,participants were first asked to generate either positive or negative thoughts about cheating. Following this manipulation of thought direction,participants were placed in either high or low power conditions. After the two inductions,cheating was measured using different paradigms – assessing cheating intentions in relationships (Study 1) and over reporting performance for monetary gain (Study 2). Relative to powerless participants,those induced to feel powerful showed more reliance on the initial thoughts induced. Consequently,the effect of the direction of the thoughts on cheating was greater for participants with high (vs. low) power. Specifically,high power increased cheating only when initial thoughts about cheating were already favorable but decreased cheating when it validated unfavorable cheating relevant thoughts. © 2023 The Authors
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104578
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/2997
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180600149&doi=10.1016%2fj.jesp.2023.104578&partnerID=40&md5=8026e0473315a6e4f2467a08adcea759
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104578
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/2997
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85180600149&doi=10.1016%2fj.jesp.2023.104578&partnerID=40&md5=8026e0473315a6e4f2467a08adcea759
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IE Business School
PID2020-116651 GB-C31
 PID2020-116651 GB-C32
 PID2022-139380NA-I00
IE University
Human Resources & Organisational Behaviour
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academic Press Inc.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academic Press Inc.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio IE
instname:IE
instname_str IE
reponame_str Repositorio IE
collection Repositorio IE
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869418730338910208
score 15,81155

Similares en LA Referencia