Switching related to inefficacy in biologics and targeted synthetic therapies for psoriatic arthritis: a comparative real-life study

Background: Switching between therapies is a recommended strategy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients who experience treatment failure; however, studies including real-life data are scarce. Objectives: To assess the incidence rate (IR) of switching between biologics and targeted synthetic disease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Freites Nuñez, Dalifer, León, Leticia, Toledano Martínez, María Esther, Candelas Rodríguez, Gloria Del Mar, Martínez, Cristina, Rodríguez Laguna, María, Rubio, Daniel, Fernández Gutiérrez, Benjamín, Abasolo, Lydia
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/114260
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/114260
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:616.72-002
Biological DMARDs
Inefficacy
Psoriatic arthritis
Switching
Targeted synthetic DMARDs
Ciencias Biomédicas
Reumatología
32 Ciencias Médicas
3205.09 Reumatología
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Switching between therapies is a recommended strategy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients who experience treatment failure; however, studies including real-life data are scarce. Objectives: To assess the incidence rate (IR) of switching between biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) due to inefficacy in PsA, and to compare the risk of switching due to inefficacy across different b/tsDMARDs groups. Design: A longitudinal retrospective study, spanning from 2007 to 2022, was conducted on patients with PsA treated with b/tsDMARDs at an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Methods: The primary outcome was switching between b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy. The independent variable was the exposure to b/tsDMARDs during follow-up. As covariates, clinical, treatment-related, and sociodemographic variables were considered. Survival techniques were run to estimate the IR of switching due to inefficacy per 100 patients*year and confidence interval at 95% (95% CI). Cox multivariate regression analyses were run to assess the risk of b/tsDMARDs switching due to inefficacy, expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Results: In all, 141 patients were included, with 893.09 patients*year follow-ups. 52.48% of them were females in their fifties. In total, 262 courses of treatment were recorded. During the study period, 56 patients presented 121 switches and 103 related to inefficacy (IR: 11.53 (9.51–13.98)). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) showed the lowest IR. In the bivariate analysis, all b/tsDMARDs had more risk of switching compared to TNFi (HR: anti-lL-17 vs TNFi: 2.26 (1.17–4.36); others vs TNFi: 3.21 (1.59–6.45)); however, this statistical significance was no longer present in the multivariate analysis once adjustments were made for the covariates. Still, the final model achieved statistical significance in the following variables: gender, clinical symptoms, prescription year, therapy courses, glucocorticoids, and sulfasalazine. Conclusion: In this study, we did not find differences in the rate of switching due to inefficacy among different groups of b/tsDMARDs. Other concomitant treatments, sociodemographic, and clinical variables were identified as risk factors for switching due to inefficacy.