Nursing students' perceptions following the enactment of the Spanish Euthanasia Law

Background: Little is known about nursing students' perceptions of euthanasia and their future role in the process, especially in Spain, where the Euthanasia Regulation Law was enacted relatively recently (2021). Aim: (I) To explore fourth-year nursing students' perceptions of euthanasia f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Arreciado Marañón, Antonia|||0000-0002-3360-1430, Biurrun-Garrido, Ainoa|||0000-0003-1955-1526, Mirabet Moral, Claudia, Navarrete Reyes, Laura|||0000-0001-9750-6048, Feijoo Cid, Maria|||0000-0002-7010-373X
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:uabarcelona_::6cbbbbec2eb65d5a93683db82240dfe0
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/328896
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1177/09697330251366571
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ethics
Clinical
Professional
Euthanasia
Qualitative research
Students
Nursing
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Little is known about nursing students' perceptions of euthanasia and their future role in the process, especially in Spain, where the Euthanasia Regulation Law was enacted relatively recently (2021). Aim: (I) To explore fourth-year nursing students' perceptions of euthanasia following its legalization in Spain; (II) To explore how nursing students envision their future professional role in the euthanasia process. Research Design: Qualitative descriptive study. Participants and research context: The study was conducted at the nursing school of a public university in Catalonia, Spain. Participants were fourth-year nursing students (2022-2023) selected through purposive sampling to ensure diverse profiles. Fourteen semi-structured individual interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. The data were analyzed using a four-phase open coding procedure. Ethical Considerations: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Respondent anonymity and data confidentiality were guaranteed. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: Three categories emerged. (1) Theory and practice in euthanasia training. Students report having only limited theoretical and practical knowledge, which leaves them feeling insecure about facing these situations. Practical experience, observing professionals, and testimonies of suffering all contribute to ethical dilemmas and an evolving vision of life and death. (2) Recognizing autonomy in the context of euthanasia. Students identify multiple dimensions of autonomy, highlighting personal autonomy (the right to decide) as a fundamental principle. (3) Perception of future role. Students see their role primarily as supporting patients and families from within a multidisciplinary team. Conclusions: Euthanasia education should be reinforced by integrating ethical and emotional reflection strategies and promoting the clinical practicum as a key learning environment. Multidisciplinary teamwork skills should be honed, especially shared decision-making. Nurses must play an active role in these processes to ensure a patient-centered and rights-based approach.