Support Needs of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Implications for Their Assessment
[EN] The construct of support needs has become a key aspect for the diagnostics, classification, and interventional management of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). However, instruments specifi cally designed to assess support needs in this population are not available. Currently, the Supports Intens...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| Repositorio: | GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/164360 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/164360 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Intellectual disability (ID) Supports intensity scale for children (SIS-C) Support needs Assessment 61 Psicología 6102 Psicología del Niño y del Adolescente 6105 Evaluación y Diagnostico en Psicología |
| Sumario: | [EN] The construct of support needs has become a key aspect for the diagnostics, classification, and interventional management of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). However, instruments specifi cally designed to assess support needs in this population are not available. Currently, the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C), which could be administered to assess students with any type of intellectual disability (ID), is the only valid tool able to assess support needs in Spain. Our aim was to verify whether the SIS-C is useful for assessing the support needs of students with ASD, regardless of whether or not they present ID. The participants were subdivided into two groups. One group included students with ASD and ID (n = 248), and the other comprised participants with ASD without an ID (n = 44). The results of the two groups were compared with those reported in the original validation sample of the SIS-C, which involved participants with ID without ASD (n = 566). The results showed that this scale could be useful for assessing support needs in the three subgroups, but it appeared that different standardized norms based on the characteristics of each specific population would be appropriate. |
|---|