Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease

Background: Subthalamic (STN) and pallidal (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improve quality of life, motor, and nonmotor symptoms (NMS) in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, few studies have compared their nonmotor effects. Objective: To compare nonmotor effects of STN-DBS and GPi-DBS. Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Dafsari, Haidar S, Dos Santos Ghilardi, Maria Gabriela, Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle, Rizos, Alexandra, Ashkan, Keyoumars, Silverdale, Monty, Evans, Julian, Martinez, Raquel C R, Cury, Rubens G, Jost, Stefanie T, Barbe, Michael T, Fink, Gereon R, Antonini, Angelo, Chaudhuri, Kallol Ray, Martínez-Martín, Pablo, Fonoff, Erich Talamoni, Timmermann, Lars, EUROPAR Study Group, IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
Repositorio:Repisalud
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/14926
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14926
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Deep Brain Stimulation
Fatigue
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Globus Pallidus
Humans
Levodopa
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Sleep
Subthalamic Nucleus
Treatment Outcome
id ES_b5d2aeacf893f436dbce1b3acbb731bb
oai_identifier_str oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/14926
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's diseaseDafsari, Haidar SDos Santos Ghilardi, Maria GabrielaVisser-Vandewalle, VeerleRizos, AlexandraAshkan, KeyoumarsSilverdale, MontyEvans, JulianMartinez, Raquel C RCury, Rubens GJost, Stefanie TBarbe, Michael TFink, Gereon RAntonini, AngeloChaudhuri, Kallol RayMartínez-Martín, PabloFonoff, Erich TalamoniTimmermann, LarsEUROPAR Study GroupIPMDS Non Motor PD Study GroupActivities of Daily LivingAgedDeep Brain StimulationFatigueFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlobus PallidusHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSleepSubthalamic NucleusTreatment OutcomeBackground: Subthalamic (STN) and pallidal (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improve quality of life, motor, and nonmotor symptoms (NMS) in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, few studies have compared their nonmotor effects. Objective: To compare nonmotor effects of STN-DBS and GPi-DBS. Methods: In this prospective, observational, multicenter study including 60 PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS (n = 40) or GPi-DBS (n = 20), we examined PDQuestionnaire (PDQ), NMSScale (NMSS), Unified PD Rating Scale-activities of daily living, -motor impairment, -complications (UPDRS-II, –III, -IV), Hoehn&Yahr, Schwab&England Scale, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Intra-group changes at follow-up were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank or paired t-test, if parametric tests were applicable, and corrected for multiple comparisons. Inter-group differences were explored with Mann-Whitney-U/unpaired t-tests. Analyses were performed before and after propensity score matching which balanced out demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics. Strength of clinical changes was assessed with effect size. Results: In both groups, PDQ, UPDRS-II, -IV, Schwab&England Scale, and NMSS improved significantly at follow-up. STN-DBS was significantly better for LEDD reduction, GPi-DBS for UPDRS-IV. While NMSS total score outcomes were similar, explorative NMSS domain analyses revealed distinct profiles: Both targets improved sleep/fatigue and mood/cognition, but only STN-DBS the miscellaneous (pain/olfaction) and attention/memory and only GPi-DBS cardiovascular and sexual function domains. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report distinct patterns of beneficial nonmotor effects of STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in PD. This study highlights the importance of NMS assessments to tailor DBS target choices to patients’ individual motor and nonmotor profiles.ElsevierThiemann StiftungFelgenhauer Foundation20222022-09-0220202020-12-0120202020-12-01research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14926reponame:Repisaludinstname:Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/149262026-06-12T12:43:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
title Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
spellingShingle Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
Dafsari, Haidar S
Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Deep Brain Stimulation
Fatigue
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Globus Pallidus
Humans
Levodopa
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Sleep
Subthalamic Nucleus
Treatment Outcome
title_short Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
title_full Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
title_fullStr Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
title_full_unstemmed Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
title_sort Beneficial nonmotor effects of subthalamic and pallidal neurostimulation in Parkinson's disease
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Dafsari, Haidar S
Dos Santos Ghilardi, Maria Gabriela
Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
Rizos, Alexandra
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Silverdale, Monty
Evans, Julian
Martinez, Raquel C R
Cury, Rubens G
Jost, Stefanie T
Barbe, Michael T
Fink, Gereon R
Antonini, Angelo
Chaudhuri, Kallol Ray
Martínez-Martín, Pablo
Fonoff, Erich Talamoni
Timmermann, Lars
EUROPAR Study Group
IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group
author Dafsari, Haidar S
author_facet Dafsari, Haidar S
Dos Santos Ghilardi, Maria Gabriela
Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
Rizos, Alexandra
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Silverdale, Monty
Evans, Julian
Martinez, Raquel C R
Cury, Rubens G
Jost, Stefanie T
Barbe, Michael T
Fink, Gereon R
Antonini, Angelo
Chaudhuri, Kallol Ray
Martínez-Martín, Pablo
Fonoff, Erich Talamoni
Timmermann, Lars
EUROPAR Study Group
IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group
author_role author
author2 Dos Santos Ghilardi, Maria Gabriela
Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
Rizos, Alexandra
Ashkan, Keyoumars
Silverdale, Monty
Evans, Julian
Martinez, Raquel C R
Cury, Rubens G
Jost, Stefanie T
Barbe, Michael T
Fink, Gereon R
Antonini, Angelo
Chaudhuri, Kallol Ray
Martínez-Martín, Pablo
Fonoff, Erich Talamoni
Timmermann, Lars
EUROPAR Study Group
IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Thiemann Stiftung
Felgenhauer Foundation

dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Deep Brain Stimulation
Fatigue
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Globus Pallidus
Humans
Levodopa
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Sleep
Subthalamic Nucleus
Treatment Outcome
topic Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Deep Brain Stimulation
Fatigue
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Globus Pallidus
Humans
Levodopa
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Sleep
Subthalamic Nucleus
Treatment Outcome
description Background: Subthalamic (STN) and pallidal (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improve quality of life, motor, and nonmotor symptoms (NMS) in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, few studies have compared their nonmotor effects. Objective: To compare nonmotor effects of STN-DBS and GPi-DBS. Methods: In this prospective, observational, multicenter study including 60 PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS (n = 40) or GPi-DBS (n = 20), we examined PDQuestionnaire (PDQ), NMSScale (NMSS), Unified PD Rating Scale-activities of daily living, -motor impairment, -complications (UPDRS-II, –III, -IV), Hoehn&Yahr, Schwab&England Scale, and levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Intra-group changes at follow-up were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank or paired t-test, if parametric tests were applicable, and corrected for multiple comparisons. Inter-group differences were explored with Mann-Whitney-U/unpaired t-tests. Analyses were performed before and after propensity score matching which balanced out demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics. Strength of clinical changes was assessed with effect size. Results: In both groups, PDQ, UPDRS-II, -IV, Schwab&England Scale, and NMSS improved significantly at follow-up. STN-DBS was significantly better for LEDD reduction, GPi-DBS for UPDRS-IV. While NMSS total score outcomes were similar, explorative NMSS domain analyses revealed distinct profiles: Both targets improved sleep/fatigue and mood/cognition, but only STN-DBS the miscellaneous (pain/olfaction) and attention/memory and only GPi-DBS cardiovascular and sexual function domains. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report distinct patterns of beneficial nonmotor effects of STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in PD. This study highlights the importance of NMS assessments to tailor DBS target choices to patients’ individual motor and nonmotor profiles.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-12-01
2020
2020-12-01
2022
2022-09-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv research article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14926
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14926
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repisalud
instname:Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
instname_str Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
reponame_str Repisalud
collection Repisalud
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869417394914459648
score 15,81155