Validation of the Spanish version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire

Purpose: To validate the Spanish Low Vision Qualify of Life (SLVQOL) questionnaire, a quality of life instrument specifically designed for patients with visual impairment, and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: The study included 170 visually impaired patients and 195 healthy subjects. P...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Pérez Mañá, Luis, Cardona, Genis, Pardo Cladellas, Yolanda, Pérez Mañá, Clara, Amorós Martínez, Jaume, González Sanchís, Luis, Wolffsohn, James S., Antón, Alfonso
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)
Repositorio:O2, repositorio institucional de la UOC
OAI Identifier:oai:openaccess.uoc.edu:10609/137108
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10609/137108
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Low vision
Quality of life
Psychometric properties
Patient reported outcomes
Validation
Generalized Partial Credit Model
Item response theory
Descrição
Resumo:Purpose: To validate the Spanish Low Vision Qualify of Life (SLVQOL) questionnaire, a quality of life instrument specifically designed for patients with visual impairment, and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: The study included 170 visually impaired patients and 195 healthy subjects. Participants were administered the SLVQOL, the NEI VFQ-25, and the EQ 5D-5L questionnaires. Reliability, test¿retest reproducibility, feasibility, and construct validity of the SLVQOL were assessed. The Generalized Partial Credit Model was used to fit the data and the performance of each item was characterized using category response curves and item information. Results: The reliability of the SLVQOL was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.978-0.985). Test¿retest reproducibility was good (p = 0.864, P < .001). A cut-off point of 105 or 106 was optimal to detect visual impairment, with a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 91.8%. Construct validity was shown by the corresponding convergence or divergence correlations between the score of the SLVQOL and its dimensions and the overall and partial scores of the NEI VFQ-25 and the EQ 5D-5L. Item response theory analysis showed discrimination and information parameters ranging from 0.539 to 3.063 and from -1.894 to 1.074, respectively. Conclusion: The SLVQOL was able to quantitatively assess and identify differences in the quality of life among patients with visual impairment and normal subjects. The evaluated psychometric properties suggest that this tool has excellent validity, internal consistency, and reproducibility, but may benefit from a reduction of the number of items.