In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems

Multiple in vitro studies reported insufficient accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for complete-arch multiple implant impression. The aim of the study is to analyze the precision of three IOSs, PIC dental (Pic dental, Iditec North West SL), TRIOS 3 (3Shape), and True Definition (Midmark Corporati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Orejas Pérez, Jaime, Giménez González, Beatriz, Ortiz Collado, Ignacio, Thuissard Vasallo, Israel John, Santamaría Laorden, Andrés
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universidad Europea (UEM)
Repositorio:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/12110
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12110
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Implantación dental
Impresión tridimensional
Materiales biocompatibles
Odontología
Tecnología médica
id ES_aa3ad417282ea3d5a09d1236e06ae25e
oai_identifier_str oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/12110
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression SystemsOrejas Pérez, JaimeGiménez González, BeatrizOrtiz Collado, IgnacioThuissard Vasallo, Israel JohnSantamaría Laorden, AndrésImplantación dentalImpresión tridimensionalMateriales biocompatiblesOdontologíaTecnología médicaMultiple in vitro studies reported insufficient accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for complete-arch multiple implant impression. The aim of the study is to analyze the precision of three IOSs, PIC dental (Pic dental, Iditec North West SL), TRIOS 3 (3Shape), and True Definition (Midmark Corporation) and the influence of several factors in the edentulous complete maxillary and mandibular arch. A fully edentulous patient with eight implants in the maxillary and in the mandibular jaw was selected. Five impressions were taken per system and arch. A suprastructure was designed on each digital working cast. The precision was analyzed comparing each of the 28 distances and seven relative angulations of the abutments of all the designed suprastructures. The descriptive statistics, the Student’s t-test, and the ANOVA test were used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). Significant differences were observed when comparing the IOSs in some of the distances and angulations. (4) The increase in the distance between implants affected the precision of T and TD but not the PIC system. The type of arch did not affect the PIC precision, but the T and TD systems performed worse in the mandibular arch. The system with the best precision was the PIC, followed by TD, and then T.20232023-06-0520222022-01-0120222022-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/12110reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científicainstname:Universidad Europea (UEM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/121102026-06-11T12:41:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
title In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
spellingShingle In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
Orejas Pérez, Jaime
Implantación dental
Impresión tridimensional
Materiales biocompatibles
Odontología
Tecnología médica
title_short In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
title_full In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
title_fullStr In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
title_sort In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Orejas Pérez, Jaime
Giménez González, Beatriz
Ortiz Collado, Ignacio
Thuissard Vasallo, Israel John
Santamaría Laorden, Andrés
author Orejas Pérez, Jaime
author_facet Orejas Pérez, Jaime
Giménez González, Beatriz
Ortiz Collado, Ignacio
Thuissard Vasallo, Israel John
Santamaría Laorden, Andrés
author_role author
author2 Giménez González, Beatriz
Ortiz Collado, Ignacio
Thuissard Vasallo, Israel John
Santamaría Laorden, Andrés
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Implantación dental
Impresión tridimensional
Materiales biocompatibles
Odontología
Tecnología médica
topic Implantación dental
Impresión tridimensional
Materiales biocompatibles
Odontología
Tecnología médica
description Multiple in vitro studies reported insufficient accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for complete-arch multiple implant impression. The aim of the study is to analyze the precision of three IOSs, PIC dental (Pic dental, Iditec North West SL), TRIOS 3 (3Shape), and True Definition (Midmark Corporation) and the influence of several factors in the edentulous complete maxillary and mandibular arch. A fully edentulous patient with eight implants in the maxillary and in the mandibular jaw was selected. Five impressions were taken per system and arch. A suprastructure was designed on each digital working cast. The precision was analyzed comparing each of the 28 distances and seven relative angulations of the abutments of all the designed suprastructures. The descriptive statistics, the Student’s t-test, and the ANOVA test were used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). Significant differences were observed when comparing the IOSs in some of the distances and angulations. (4) The increase in the distance between implants affected the precision of T and TD but not the PIC system. The type of arch did not affect the PIC precision, but the T and TD systems performed worse in the mandibular arch. The system with the best precision was the PIC, followed by TD, and then T.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-01-01
2022
2022-01-01
2023
2023-06-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12110
url http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12110
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
instname:Universidad Europea (UEM)
instname_str Universidad Europea (UEM)
reponame_str ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
collection ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869416144703586304
score 15,301603

Similares en LA Referencia