Santa María del Circo (David Toscana, 1998) y Zócalo (Francis Alÿs, 1999) como espacios de resignificación
[EN] On this paper we develop a comparative approach between two art objects of different nature: first of them is film called Zócalo (Francis Alÿs, 1 ); and, second of them, is Santa María del Circo novel (David Toscana, 1 8). Comparison is possible due to these objecs contain some similar elements...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | capítulo de livro |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/107095 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/107095 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Espacio Semiosfera Heterotopía Zócalo Santa María del Circo Space Semiosphere |
| Resumo: | [EN] On this paper we develop a comparative approach between two art objects of different nature: first of them is film called Zócalo (Francis Alÿs, 1 ); and, second of them, is Santa María del Circo novel (David Toscana, 1 8). Comparison is possible due to these objecs contain some similar elements. On both of them, we find: these are transit spaces and these are ,also, symbolic registers, although novel is imaginary one and film is real one; irruption of characters on both spaces means perturbing; on both of them, we can use semiosphere concept because they keep frontiers delimited ; and so on, more motives to comparison. Besides, spaces can be interpretated according with Focault’s concept of heterotopia. Also, these spaces are into other heterotopia: that is to say, Zócalo is into city of Mexico and Zócalo and any city could be read like this kind of nonplace. It is the same to Santa María del Circo, town which is into desert because desert could be a heterotopia too. So, in theory, been treated with a semiotics’ concept allows to sum an anthropological interpretation. Analyzing with these concepts (semiosphere and heterotopia), allows us to talk about art’s representations of social reality in the nineties of twenty century. It is not just about a written and a visual discourse, it is about how a writer and an artist perceive their reality, how they take it and how they express it out. |
|---|