Semiosphere Challenged by Anthropo-Semiotic Enunciation
The confrontation between the model of semiosphere, the Greimassian theory and contemporary anthropology highlights the difficulty of implementing an epistemology of diversity starting from Lotman's work. This difficulty leads to question systematically the conditions required for an anthropolo...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repositorio: | Bakhtiniana |
| Idioma: | francés portugués inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37869 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/bakhtiniana/article/view/37869 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Sémiosphère Énonciation Anthropo-sémiotique Altérité Semiosfera Enunciação Antropossemiótica Alteridade Semiosphere Enunciation Anthropo-semiotics Otherness |
| Sumario: | The confrontation between the model of semiosphere, the Greimassian theory and contemporary anthropology highlights the difficulty of implementing an epistemology of diversity starting from Lotman's work. This difficulty leads to question systematically the conditions required for an anthropological enunciation, in particular summoning the positions of Descola, Latour and Viveiros de Castro. This confrontation tries to update the semiosphere model. |
|---|