Hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: Review and survival meta-analysis of initial local therapy using minimal prognostic criteria

Background and Aims: Macrovascular invasion (MaVI) defines advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and typically mandates systemic therapy, yet some guidelines advocate surgery or locoregional approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of overall survival (OS) in HCC with M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Fortuny, Marta, De Rosa, Antonio, Roca, Ignacio, Ouchi, Dan, Suárez, Elisaul, Cadiz, Andrea, Matute-González, Mario, Moon, Andrew M., Rimola, Jordi, Torres, Ferran, Reig, Maria
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears
Repositorio:Docusalut
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/26543
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/26543
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Thrombosis
Trombosis
EBRT
TACE
TARE
portal vein tumor thrombus
resection
Descripción
Sumario:Background and Aims: Macrovascular invasion (MaVI) defines advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and typically mandates systemic therapy, yet some guidelines advocate surgery or locoregional approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of overall survival (OS) in HCC with MaVI treated with approaches other than systemic therapy, enforcing stringent inclusion criteria to exclude studies lacking a minimal prognostic dataset and to improve cohort comparability. Approach and Results: PRISMA-guided methods were used (CRD420251051847). PubMed was searched (January 2008 to November 2024). Eligible studies reported OS for HCC with MaVI and provided baseline performance status and liver function; studies without adequate prognostic information were excluded. Data on OS at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were extracted, and heterogeneity was assessed. Seventy-three studies met criteria (104 treatment arms; 10,329 patients). Despite a rigorous identification process, substantial heterogeneity persisted for most modalities ( I 2 >80%), precluding robust pooling. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) monotherapy was the only treatment with low heterogeneity ( I 2 =0%) and showed a pooled 1-year OS of 34% (95% CI: 20%–48%). Apparent advantages of sequential strategies likely reflected confounding by indication and immortal-time bias, as only patients who lived long enough and were sufficiently fit proceeded through the full sequence. Data completeness declined beyond 12 months (missing OS: 0% at 1 y; 17.3% at 2 y; 32.7% at 3 y; 70.2% at 5 y). Conclusions: In HCC with MaVI, 1-year OS is the most comparable endpoint across modalities. This analysis identifies TARE as the only consistently reproducible option, showing a 1-year survival of 34%. In contrast, surgery and sequential therapies remain confounded by substantial heterogeneity. Accordingly, stratified head-to-head trials comparing alternative modalities against immunotherapy are warranted.