Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version

Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument and Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale Spain Version (BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV) using the ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria as well as other catatonia scale...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Serrat, Francesc|||0000-0002-8503-5848, Cuevas-Esteban, Jorge|||0000-0002-6172-4331, Baladon, Luisa, Rabaneda Lombarte, Neus, Diez-Quevedo, Crisanto|||0000-0002-0705-295X, Iglesias-González, Maria|||0000-0002-7794-1533
Format: article
Publication Date:2023
Country:España
Institution:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repository:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:325010
Online Access:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/325010
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.07.004
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Catatonia
BFCRS2
Reliability3
Validation4
Diagnosis5
id ES_9e026ff2a47fc6cc188e8a6960b69d2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ddd.uab.cat:325010
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain versionSerrat, Francesc|||0000-0002-8503-5848Cuevas-Esteban, Jorge|||0000-0002-6172-4331Baladon, LuisaRabaneda Lombarte, NeusDiez-Quevedo, Crisanto|||0000-0002-0705-295XIglesias-González, Maria|||0000-0002-7794-1533CatatoniaBFCRS2Reliability3Validation4Diagnosis5Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument and Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale Spain Version (BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV) using the ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria as well as other catatonia scales. Methods: One hundred patients were admitted to the inpatient psychiatry unit at Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol and two psychiatrists administered the BFCRS-SV to the first 10 patients to assess inter-rater reliability. The BFCRS-SV, BFCSI-SV, Modified Rogers Scale (MRS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scales, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Modified Simpson-Angus Scale were then employed. Results: The results showed that 27% of patients had catatonia using the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Additionally, 51% of patients had 2 or more BFCRSI-SV items (Sensitivity: 100%; Specificity: 67.12%). The alpha coefficient values were 0.80 and 0.84 for the BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV, respectively, and the intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.902 and 0.903. The area under the ROC curve was 0.971 and 0.96, and the instruments had a strong positive correlation with the DSM-5 score, ICD-11 score, and MRS. The study identified a three-factor model comprising the inhibition, excitement, and parakinetic dimensions. Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that the BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV are valid and reliable tools for the diagnosis of catatonia, especially when using a cut-off score of 5 or higher for the BFCSI-SV and 7 or higher for the BFCRS-SV. 22023-01-0120232023-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/325010https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.07.004reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, i la comunicació pública de l'obra, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. No es permet la creació d'obres derivades.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:3250102026-06-06T12:50:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
title Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
spellingShingle Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
Serrat, Francesc|||0000-0002-8503-5848
Catatonia
BFCRS2
Reliability3
Validation4
Diagnosis5
title_short Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
title_full Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
title_fullStr Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
title_full_unstemmed Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
title_sort Factor analysis and validation of the Bush Francis catatonia rating scale-Spain version
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Serrat, Francesc|||0000-0002-8503-5848
Cuevas-Esteban, Jorge|||0000-0002-6172-4331
Baladon, Luisa
Rabaneda Lombarte, Neus
Diez-Quevedo, Crisanto|||0000-0002-0705-295X
Iglesias-González, Maria|||0000-0002-7794-1533
author Serrat, Francesc|||0000-0002-8503-5848
author_facet Serrat, Francesc|||0000-0002-8503-5848
Cuevas-Esteban, Jorge|||0000-0002-6172-4331
Baladon, Luisa
Rabaneda Lombarte, Neus
Diez-Quevedo, Crisanto|||0000-0002-0705-295X
Iglesias-González, Maria|||0000-0002-7794-1533
author_role author
author2 Cuevas-Esteban, Jorge|||0000-0002-6172-4331
Baladon, Luisa
Rabaneda Lombarte, Neus
Diez-Quevedo, Crisanto|||0000-0002-0705-295X
Iglesias-González, Maria|||0000-0002-7794-1533
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Catatonia
BFCRS2
Reliability3
Validation4
Diagnosis5
topic Catatonia
BFCRS2
Reliability3
Validation4
Diagnosis5
description Background and objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument and Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale Spain Version (BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV) using the ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria as well as other catatonia scales. Methods: One hundred patients were admitted to the inpatient psychiatry unit at Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol and two psychiatrists administered the BFCRS-SV to the first 10 patients to assess inter-rater reliability. The BFCRS-SV, BFCSI-SV, Modified Rogers Scale (MRS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scales, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, and Modified Simpson-Angus Scale were then employed. Results: The results showed that 27% of patients had catatonia using the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Additionally, 51% of patients had 2 or more BFCRSI-SV items (Sensitivity: 100%; Specificity: 67.12%). The alpha coefficient values were 0.80 and 0.84 for the BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV, respectively, and the intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.902 and 0.903. The area under the ROC curve was 0.971 and 0.96, and the instruments had a strong positive correlation with the DSM-5 score, ICD-11 score, and MRS. The study identified a three-factor model comprising the inhibition, excitement, and parakinetic dimensions. Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that the BFCSI-SV and BFCRS-SV are valid and reliable tools for the diagnosis of catatonia, especially when using a cut-off score of 5 or higher for the BFCSI-SV and 7 or higher for the BFCRS-SV.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2
2023-01-01
2023
2023-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ddd.uab.cat/record/325010
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.07.004
url https://ddd.uab.cat/record/325010
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2023.07.004
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
instname_str Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
collection Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414790689980416
score 15.812429

Similar Items