Interlaboratory comparison of microplastic extraction methods from marine biota tissues: A harmonization exercise of the Plastic Busters MPAs project

In the framework of the Plastic Busters MPAs project, a harmonization exercise on two methods of microplastic extraction from biological samples i.e. 15% H2O2 digestion and 10% KOH digestion was carried out. The two methods were tested in four laboratories on fish gastrointestinal tracts and mussel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Tsangaris, Catherine, Panti, Cristina, Compa, Montserrat, Pedà, Cristina, Digka, Nikoletta, Baini, Matteo, D’Alessandro, Michela, Alomar, Carme, Patsiou, Danae, Giani, Dario, Romeo, Teresa, Deudero, Salud
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:digitalcsic_::f686b37d23820976d4ee45fa03f74b31
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/317742
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Microplastic
Medio Marino
Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares
Ingestion
Isolation
Protocol harmonization
Mullus barbatus
Mytilus galloprovincialis
fish
marine pollution
biota
pollution
rights
Descripción
Sumario:In the framework of the Plastic Busters MPAs project, a harmonization exercise on two methods of microplastic extraction from biological samples i.e. 15% H2O2 digestion and 10% KOH digestion was carried out. The two methods were tested in four laboratories on fish gastrointestinal tracts and mussel tissues spiked with polyethylene, polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate. The recovery percentage of microplastics for each method, species and polymer tested were overall similar among laboratories, and interlaboratory coefficient of variation was less than 11% for the majority of samples. Microplastic recovery rates for the two methods were similar for each sample tested, but overall mean interlaboratory recovery rate using KOH (96.67%) was higher than H2O2 (88.75%). Results validate the use of both methods for extracting microplastics from biota tissues. However, when comparing the two methods in terms of microplastic recovery rate, time consumed, technical difficulties and cost, digestion with 10% KOH is considered optimal.