Analysis of craniocervical abnormalities in osteogenesis imperfecta during growth

Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disease characterized by osteopenia and bone fragility in which the craniocervical junction is also affected. This is of special relevance due to the high prevalence in anomalies described in the literature as follows: basilar invagination, basilar impressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Nova García, Manuel Joaquín De, García de Sola, Rafael, Burgueño Torres, Laura
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/102394
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/102394
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:616.314-053.2
615.849
616.71
572.72
Osteogenesis imperfecta
Craniocervical junction
Platybasia
Basilar impression
Basilar invagination
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ciencias Biomédicas
Odontología (Medicina)
Odontología infantil
Diagnóstico por imagen y medicina nuclear
32 Ciencias Médicas
3207.14 Osteopatología
Descripción
Sumario:Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disease characterized by osteopenia and bone fragility in which the craniocervical junction is also affected. This is of special relevance due to the high prevalence in anomalies described in the literature as follows: basilar invagination, basilar impression, and platybasia. Methods. We analyzed 19 lateral skull radiographs and 14 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 28 patients with OI in which eight linear and five angular measurements were plotted to determine the existence of craniocervical junction anomalies and compare them with 38 lateral skull radiographs and 28 MRIs performed on age-matched healthy controls. Results. From the reference values obtained from the control sample for each age group, we established the limit value at which pathology could be suspected. Some of the variables studied showed a clear trend associated with growth. More than half of the patients (60.71%) presented an anomaly in the skull base. Conclusions. According to the diagnostic criteria used and taking +2.5 SD as the limit value, 10.71% of the patients had basilar invagination, 35.71% had basilar impression, and 39.29% had platybasia, the latter being the most common finding