In vitro co-infection by cytomegalovirus improves the antiviral activity of ganciclovir against human adenovirus

Human adenovirus (HAdV) infection has an important clinical impact in the immunosuppressed population and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The lack of a specific, safe and effective antiviral treatment against HAdV makes necessary the search for new therapeutic options. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Aguilar Guisado, Manuela, Marrugal-Lorenzo, José Antonio, Berastegui-Cabrera, Judith, Merino Díaz, Laura, Pachón, Jerónimo, Sánchez-Céspedes, Javier
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/231344
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/231344
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Ganciclovir
Cidofovir
Cytomegalovirus
Adenovirus
Co-infection
HSCT
Descripción
Sumario:Human adenovirus (HAdV) infection has an important clinical impact in the immunosuppressed population and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The lack of a specific, safe and effective antiviral treatment against HAdV makes necessary the search for new therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ganciclovir (GCV) against HAdV in co-infection by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and HAdV in cellular cultures. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to measure HAdV and HCMV DNA replication efficiency in monocultures and in co-infection situations in the presence of both cidofovir (CDV) and GCV. The effects of GCV and CDV were also evaluated in a burst assay (used to measure the production of virus particles) for both viruses, alone and in combination. GCV decreased by 1-log the HAdV DNA replication efficiency in co-infection with HCMV compared with its activity in HAdV monoculture. The burst assay showed that the reductions in virus yield in the presence of GCV were higher for HCMV and co-infection than for HAdV in monoculture (145.2±35.5- vs. 116.4±27.3- vs. 23.0±10.0-fold, respectively, P<0.05). The improved anti-HAdV activity of GCV during co-infection may be because of the more efficient phosphorylation of GCV by the HCMV protein kinase, UL97. Patients treated with GCV as pre-emptive therapy for HCMV infection may be considered as low-risk for developing HAdV infections; however, further evaluations are required to confirm these results.