Conservation of Phenotypes in the Roman High- and Low-Avoidance Rat Strains After Embryo Transfer
The Roman high- (RHA-I) and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rat strains are bi-directionally bred for their good versus non-acquisition of two-way active avoidance, respectively. They have recently been re-derived through embryo transfer (ET) to Sprague-Dawley females to generate specific pathogen free (SPF)...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:285949 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/285949 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/s10519-017-9854-2 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Behavioural phenotyping Embryo transfer Roman rat strains Stress-induced corticosterone Two-way active avoidance |
| Sumario: | The Roman high- (RHA-I) and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rat strains are bi-directionally bred for their good versus non-acquisition of two-way active avoidance, respectively. They have recently been re-derived through embryo transfer (ET) to Sprague-Dawley females to generate specific pathogen free (SPF) RHA-I/RLA-I rats. Offspring were phenotyped at generations 1 (G1, born from Sprague-Dawley females), 3 and 5 (G3 and G5, born from RHA-I and RLA-I from G2-G4, respectively), and compared with generation 60 from our non-SPF colony. Phenotyping included two-way avoidance acquisition, context-conditioned fear, open-field behaviour, novelty-seeking, baseline startle, pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) and stress-induced increase in plasma corticosterone concentration. Post-ET between-strain differences in avoidance acquisition, context-conditioned freezing and novelty-induced self-grooming are conserved. Other behavioural traits (i.e. hole-board head-dipping, novel object exploration, open-field activity, startle, PPI) differentiate the strains at G3-G5 but not at G1, suggesting that the pre-/post-natal environment may have influenced these co-segregated traits at G1, though further selection pressure along the subsequent generations (G1-G5) rescues the typical strain-related differences. |
|---|