On “innovation and institutional ownership”

In their article “Innovation and Institutional Ownership”, Aghion, Van Reenen and Zingales (2013) find that the rise in institutional stock ownership in the U.S. during the 1990s led to an increase in corporate innovation, as measured by patent and patent citation counts. Their article concludes tha...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Simeth, M. (Markus)|||/items/51deda5a-558c-46d5-8fe2-70fd144bfbfb, Wehrheim, D. (David)|||/items/5b7acb6a-ef0d-4612-a96d-478c90d4651a
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Navarra
Repositorio:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/69347
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/69347
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Corporate governance
Innovation
Institutional ownership
Managerial short-termism
Patents
Descrição
Resumo:In their article “Innovation and Institutional Ownership”, Aghion, Van Reenen and Zingales (2013) find that the rise in institutional stock ownership in the U.S. during the 1990s led to an increase in corporate innovation, as measured by patent and patent citation counts. Their article concludes that “contrary to the view that institutional ownership induces a short-term focus in managers, we find that their presence boosts innovation” (p. 302). Subsequent research has generally accepted this finding at face value. However, we uncover several critical issues with their data. Addressing these issues renders the results economically and statistically insignificant and, in some instances, even suggests a negative relationship between institutional ownership and U.S. innovation.