Functional Changes of the Ocular Surface Sensory Nerves Due to Contact Lens Use in Young Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Users
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in corneal sensory nerve functionality in young asymptomatic (CL-A) and symptomatic (CL-S) contact lens (CL) users. Methods: CL wearers (23.8 ± 1.0 years, n = 31) were classified as CL-S with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≥ 1...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche |
| Repositorio: | REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dspace.umh.es:11000/38123 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11000/38123 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | contact lenses corneal sensitivity corneal sensory nerves |
| Sumario: | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in corneal sensory nerve functionality in young asymptomatic (CL-A) and symptomatic (CL-S) contact lens (CL) users. Methods: CL wearers (23.8 ± 1.0 years, n = 31) were classified as CL-S with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≥ 13 (n = 14) or CL-A. Users of eye glasses (EG; 24.5 ± 0.8 years, n = 29) with OSDI < 13 participated as controls. The sensations evoked by mechanical, chemical (gas esthesiometer), and cold (4°C saline drops) stimuli were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VASs). Moreover, tear volume, tear break up time (TBUT), blinking frequency (BF), and ocular surface temperature (OST; IR thermography) were also measured. Results: Mechanical and chemical stimuli produced similar scores in the CL-A and EG participants, although the CL-A subjects referred to stronger irritation (p < 0.05). Likewise, the VAS intensity in response to cold stimuli did not differ between CL-A and EG subjects, while the ability to detect cold was significantly worse in CL-S users (p < 0.05). CL-A users had a similar tear volume, a higher BF (p < 0.01) and shorter TBUT (p < 0.001) to EG wearers, and blinking and TBUT were also altered significantly in CL-S users (p < 0.01). Interestingly, the OST was significantly lower in CL-A users (p < 0.05) than in EG wearers, but not in CL-S users. Conclusions: Using CLs modifies corneal sensitivity, blinking and tearing in young volunteers. Even if they have yet to develop clinical signs of inflammation, they display changes in corneal sensitivity consistent with the sensitization of corneal nociceptors and the inhibition cold thermoreceptors, phenomena that occur under inflammatory conditions. The differences in corneal sensitivity and OST between CL-A and CL-S users could reflect the extent of nerve damage and inflammation at the ocular surface. |
|---|