On the contribution of eco-innovation features to a circular economy: A micro-level quantitative approach
The circular economy (CE) and eco?innovation (EI) are two concepts deemed instrumental in achieving a sustainable transition. They have been proposed in the academic literature and by practitioners and have acquired very high public policy relevance, being endorsed by policymakers and ultimately lea...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Alcalá (UAH) |
| Repositório: | e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcalá |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ebuah.uah.es:10017/62235 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10017/62235 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2688 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Circular economy Eco-innovation Small and medium sized firms Spain Transition Economía Empresa Economics Management science |
| Resumo: | The circular economy (CE) and eco?innovation (EI) are two concepts deemed instrumental in achieving a sustainable transition. They have been proposed in the academic literature and by practitioners and have acquired very high public policy relevance, being endorsed by policymakers and ultimately leading to regulations supporting them. It has been argued that both concepts are compatible and interrelated and that EI is instrumental in achieving the CE. However, little is known about how different EI features contribute to the CE at the microlevel. This article tries to cover this gap. Its aim is to assess and quantify the causal relationship between different EI features and the CE with the help of a unique dataset of small? and medium?sized firms in Spain and an econometric analysis. Our results show that only systemic EIs contribute to a global CE, whereas other EI types such as component additions or small changes in existing production processes could even be barriers to high levels of circularity. It is found out that technological novelty is not relevant for reaching the CE. The results support the understanding of how EIs enable a transition to the CE. Care should be taken not to promote incremental EIs that do not only achieve low (or no) circularity but that effectively lock?in the economic system in solutions that entail a barrier to the achievement of high?level circularity. |
|---|