Requiem for the burden of proof

The burden of proof, a notion specific to the medieval Roman-canonical process but alien to the four Roman procedural systems, ought to have become obsolete with the introduction of the free assessment of evidence. However, doctrinal and jurisprudential inertia in the use of traditional concepts, as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Nieva Fenoll, Jordi
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/225211
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/225211
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Prova (Dret)
Dret processal (Dret romà)
Evidence (Law)
Procedure (Roman law)
id ES_72d154f99c1951d5d6a664ca0bf8db2e
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:2445/225211
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Requiem for the burden of proofNieva Fenoll, JordiProva (Dret)Dret processal (Dret romà)Evidence (Law)Procedure (Roman law)The burden of proof, a notion specific to the medieval Roman-canonical process but alien to the four Roman procedural systems, ought to have become obsolete with the introduction of the free assessment of evidence. However, doctrinal and jurisprudential inertia in the use of traditional concepts, as well as the conservation of biphasic processes in legal systems of Anglo-Saxon origin, including the Roman-canonical process, have favoured the persistence of a notion that, when observed objectively, has ceased to have any legitimate practical value in current judicial processes.Marcial Pons, Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales, S.A. y U.B.2026202620222026info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion24 p.application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/225211Articles publicats en revistes (Dret Administratiu, Dret Processal, Història del Dret i Dret Financer i Tributari)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésReproducció del document publicat a:Revista Italoespañola de Derecho Procesal, 2022cc-by (c) Jordi Nieva Fenoll, 2022http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/2252112026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Requiem for the burden of proof
title Requiem for the burden of proof
spellingShingle Requiem for the burden of proof
Nieva Fenoll, Jordi
Prova (Dret)
Dret processal (Dret romà)
Evidence (Law)
Procedure (Roman law)
title_short Requiem for the burden of proof
title_full Requiem for the burden of proof
title_fullStr Requiem for the burden of proof
title_full_unstemmed Requiem for the burden of proof
title_sort Requiem for the burden of proof
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Nieva Fenoll, Jordi
author Nieva Fenoll, Jordi
author_facet Nieva Fenoll, Jordi
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Prova (Dret)
Dret processal (Dret romà)
Evidence (Law)
Procedure (Roman law)
topic Prova (Dret)
Dret processal (Dret romà)
Evidence (Law)
Procedure (Roman law)
description The burden of proof, a notion specific to the medieval Roman-canonical process but alien to the four Roman procedural systems, ought to have become obsolete with the introduction of the free assessment of evidence. However, doctrinal and jurisprudential inertia in the use of traditional concepts, as well as the conservation of biphasic processes in legal systems of Anglo-Saxon origin, including the Roman-canonical process, have favoured the persistence of a notion that, when observed objectively, has ceased to have any legitimate practical value in current judicial processes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2026
2026
2026
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/225211
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/225211
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a:
Revista Italoespañola de Derecho Procesal, 2022
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv cc-by (c) Jordi Nieva Fenoll, 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv cc-by (c) Jordi Nieva Fenoll, 2022
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 24 p.
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Marcial Pons, Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales, S.A. y U.B.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Marcial Pons, Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales, S.A. y U.B.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Dret Administratiu, Dret Processal, Història del Dret i Dret Financer i Tributari)
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410763548917760
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia