La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico

Under a progressive dogmatic construction, the notion of procedural substitution has not always been defined equally. At present, however, there is a scientific consensus that procedural substitution refers to situations in which a person asserts other people’s rights in civil proceedings for their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Sánchez López, Bárbara
Format: doctoral thesis
Publication Date:2017
Country:España
Institution:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repository:Docta Complutense
Language:Spanish
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/22304
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22304
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:347.9(043.2)
Derecho procesal
Sustitución procesal
Derecho procesal civil
Representación legal
Sustitución del demandante
Procedural substitution
Historiography of standing in civil procedural law
Spanish civil procedural law
Real party in interest and a formal party
Representation in civil procedure
Plaintiff’s substitution
Derecho civil
5605.02 Derecho Civil
id ES_72c8fccef2cffdfd1b9cb331a1d9ab9c
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/22304
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling La sustitución procesal: análisis críticoSánchez López, Bárbara347.9(043.2)Derecho procesalSustitución procesalDerecho procesal civilRepresentación legalSustitución del demandanteProcedural substitutionHistoriography of standing in civil procedural lawSpanish civil procedural lawReal party in interest and a formal partyRepresentation in civil procedurePlaintiff’s substitutionDerecho procesalDerecho civil5605.02 Derecho CivilUnder a progressive dogmatic construction, the notion of procedural substitution has not always been defined equally. At present, however, there is a scientific consensus that procedural substitution refers to situations in which a person asserts other people’s rights in civil proceedings for their own benefit. The current definition of procedural substitution is the result of its own historicity or, if preferred, of the historical evolution of the assumptions that traditionally have been considered manifestations of this alleged legal institution. It was significantly heterogenous, as an expression of its own evolution and of the dogmatic construction on the parties’ status in civil proceedings. It was Josef KOHLER who introduced and included procedural substitution in the General Theory of Law, laying the groundwork for considering it as a phenomenon with a purely procedural nature, as a power or faculty to be exercised within a process. Thereon this institution was generally studied and researched by the German literature, although its subsequent developments have had little impact on our system. The second significant step toward raising the substitution to the status of an authentic procedural institution was given by the Italian literature and its efforts to import the first foundations laid about in Germany. It was Giuseppe CHIOVENDA who applied it to other cases and, paradigmatically, to the subrogation action, which could not be identified as such under German law. The first notions and formulations of the procedural substitution give cause to the Italian literature to deepen the dogmatic study about the parties within the civil procedure and the autonomy of the right of action and, in turn, served to illuminate the construction of the concept of standing in civil procedure, precisely from the phenomena of dissociation between the ownership of the right which is the subject of the process and the ownership of the right of action, that are considered characteristic of the phenomena of procedural substitution...Universidad Complutense de MadridOliva Santos, Andrés de laGascón Inchausti, FernandoUniversidad Complutense de Madrid20172017-06-1220172017-06-12doctoral thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22304reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Españolspaopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/223042026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
title La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
spellingShingle La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
Sánchez López, Bárbara
347.9(043.2)
Derecho procesal
Sustitución procesal
Derecho procesal civil
Representación legal
Sustitución del demandante
Procedural substitution
Historiography of standing in civil procedural law
Spanish civil procedural law
Real party in interest and a formal party
Representation in civil procedure
Plaintiff’s substitution
Derecho procesal
Derecho civil
5605.02 Derecho Civil
title_short La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
title_full La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
title_fullStr La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
title_full_unstemmed La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
title_sort La sustitución procesal: análisis crítico
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sánchez López, Bárbara
author Sánchez López, Bárbara
author_facet Sánchez López, Bárbara
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Oliva Santos, Andrés de la
Gascón Inchausti, Fernando
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 347.9(043.2)
Derecho procesal
Sustitución procesal
Derecho procesal civil
Representación legal
Sustitución del demandante
Procedural substitution
Historiography of standing in civil procedural law
Spanish civil procedural law
Real party in interest and a formal party
Representation in civil procedure
Plaintiff’s substitution
Derecho procesal
Derecho civil
5605.02 Derecho Civil
topic 347.9(043.2)
Derecho procesal
Sustitución procesal
Derecho procesal civil
Representación legal
Sustitución del demandante
Procedural substitution
Historiography of standing in civil procedural law
Spanish civil procedural law
Real party in interest and a formal party
Representation in civil procedure
Plaintiff’s substitution
Derecho procesal
Derecho civil
5605.02 Derecho Civil
description Under a progressive dogmatic construction, the notion of procedural substitution has not always been defined equally. At present, however, there is a scientific consensus that procedural substitution refers to situations in which a person asserts other people’s rights in civil proceedings for their own benefit. The current definition of procedural substitution is the result of its own historicity or, if preferred, of the historical evolution of the assumptions that traditionally have been considered manifestations of this alleged legal institution. It was significantly heterogenous, as an expression of its own evolution and of the dogmatic construction on the parties’ status in civil proceedings. It was Josef KOHLER who introduced and included procedural substitution in the General Theory of Law, laying the groundwork for considering it as a phenomenon with a purely procedural nature, as a power or faculty to be exercised within a process. Thereon this institution was generally studied and researched by the German literature, although its subsequent developments have had little impact on our system. The second significant step toward raising the substitution to the status of an authentic procedural institution was given by the Italian literature and its efforts to import the first foundations laid about in Germany. It was Giuseppe CHIOVENDA who applied it to other cases and, paradigmatically, to the subrogation action, which could not be identified as such under German law. The first notions and formulations of the procedural substitution give cause to the Italian literature to deepen the dogmatic study about the parties within the civil procedure and the autonomy of the right of action and, in turn, served to illuminate the construction of the concept of standing in civil procedure, precisely from the phenomena of dissociation between the ownership of the right which is the subject of the process and the ownership of the right of action, that are considered characteristic of the phenomena of procedural substitution...
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-06-12
2017
2017-06-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv doctoral thesis
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22304
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/22304
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
spa
language_invalid_str_mv Español
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410761230516224
score 15,300719

Similar Items