Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto

The contemporary recovery of the concept of 'virtue' has given rise to a fruitful research on how to define and relate virtue to other concepts and areas. Under the name of virtue ethics, authors from different perspectives consider virtue to be an essential element of moral philosophy, si...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Mauri, Margarita
Format: article
Publication Date:2020
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Barcelona
Repository:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/172288
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/172288
Access Level:Embargoed access
Keyword:Virtut
Filosofia
Virtue
Philosophy
id ES_71ca43033d3dcdf0708b4d16fa495d0b
oai_identifier_str oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/172288
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un conceptoMauri, MargaritaVirtutFilosofiaVirtuePhilosophyThe contemporary recovery of the concept of 'virtue' has given rise to a fruitful research on how to define and relate virtue to other concepts and areas. Under the name of virtue ethics, authors from different perspectives consider virtue to be an essential element of moral philosophy, since it fulfills the task of explaining the human moral dimension. Many of these authors share the intention to deal with virtue by isolating the concept of the set of notions that could contribute to its full explanation. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the contemporary definitions of 'virtue' to show that they are insufficient to define its natureAletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural2020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/172288Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UBinstname:Universidad de BarcelonaEspañolhttps://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0049Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 2020, vol. 76, num. 1, p. 49-60https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0049(c) Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural, 2020info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessoai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/1722882026-05-27T06:46:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
title Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
spellingShingle Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
Mauri, Margarita
Virtut
Filosofia
Virtue
Philosophy
title_short Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
title_full Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
title_fullStr Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
title_full_unstemmed Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
title_sort Neovirtud. Las insuficiencias de la recuperación de un concepto
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mauri, Margarita
author Mauri, Margarita
author_facet Mauri, Margarita
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Virtut
Filosofia
Virtue
Philosophy
topic Virtut
Filosofia
Virtue
Philosophy
description The contemporary recovery of the concept of 'virtue' has given rise to a fruitful research on how to define and relate virtue to other concepts and areas. Under the name of virtue ethics, authors from different perspectives consider virtue to be an essential element of moral philosophy, since it fulfills the task of explaining the human moral dimension. Many of these authors share the intention to deal with virtue by isolating the concept of the set of notions that could contribute to its full explanation. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the contemporary definitions of 'virtue' to show that they are insufficient to define its nature
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/172288
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/172288
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
language_invalid_str_mv Español
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0049
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 2020, vol. 76, num. 1, p. 49-60
https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0049
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural, 2020
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural, 2020
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Aletheia. Associação Científica e Cultural
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
instname:Universidad de Barcelona
instname_str Universidad de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de la UB
collection Dipòsit Digital de la UB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410677923250176
score 15.300719

Similar Items