Fomentar la participación en clase de los estudiantes universitarios y evaluarla
[EN] The objective of this research is to analyze a system the aim of which is to encourage the participation of students based on critical reflection. The method consists mainly of presenting material in the classroom to be constructively criticized by the students and assigning the task of noting...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/123096 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/123096 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Participación Pensamiento crítico Universidad Educación Estudiantes universitarios Formación Diálogo Clases interactivas Participation Critical thinking University Education University students Training Dialogue Interactive classes |
| Sumario: | [EN] The objective of this research is to analyze a system the aim of which is to encourage the participation of students based on critical reflection. The method consists mainly of presenting material in the classroom to be constructively criticized by the students and assigning the task of noting down the participation by at least two randomly selected students. It is a relatively objective system of evaluating participation. The methodology is based on a mixed method, qualitative-quantitative. Participant observation together with a survey of 507 students was used, with a response rate of 55% of the students. 66% consider that students’ critical capacity must be developed in a high or very high degree (compared to 9% in low or very low degree) and 51% agree in a high o very high degree with the rotating system of recording the student’s participation in class (compared to 19% in a low or very low degree). There is a significant association between the size of the class group and the grade obtained in participation (r = -0.96), with worse scores in the most numerous groups. It is surprising that students with low participation (from 0 to 3 interventions) are the most numerous group, with 42.2%. It reflects that the method has excluded or almost excluded a very high percentage of students. If you add the average and high participation, the method works more or less well for a majority of students, the 58.2%, but we must make the maximum effort to integrate the large group of excluded people. |
|---|