Developing countries can adapt to climate change effectively using nature-based solutions

Evidence on the effectiveness of climate change adaptation interventions in low- and middle-income countries has been rapidly growing in recent years, particularly in the agricultural and coastal sectors. Here we address the question of whether results are consistent across intervention types, and r...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio|||0000-0002-5170-1718, Bisaro, Alexander|||0000-0003-4281-0012, Moull, Kevin|||0000-0002-5776-4314, Albizua, Amaia|||0000-0001-8381-5288, Mank, Isabel, Hinkel, Jochen|||0000-0001-7590-992X, Leppert, Gerald, Noltze, Martin
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:292444
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/292444
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01356-0
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
SDG 13 - Climate Action
SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
Descrição
Resumo:Evidence on the effectiveness of climate change adaptation interventions in low- and middle-income countries has been rapidly growing in recent years, particularly in the agricultural and coastal sectors. Here we address the question of whether results are consistent across intervention types, and risk reduction versus development-related outcomes using a systematic review of 363 empirical observations published in the scientific literature. Generally, we found more evidence of risk reduction outcomes in the coastal sector than in the agricultural sector, and more evidence of development-related outcomes in the agricultural sector. Further, results indicate that nature-based solutions have the strongest positive effects for both the coastal and agricultural sectors. Social/behavioural interventions in the coastal sector show negative effects on development-related outcomes that will need to be further tested. Taken together, our results highlight the opportunity for development and climate adaptation practitioners to promote adaptation interventions with co-benefits beyond risk reduction, particularly in the case of nature-based solutions.