The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective

This chapter examines how European citizens’ evaluations of different democracy models have evolved from 2012 to 2022, a period of significant economic, social, and political change. Building on the authors’ previous work on this topic, published in 2016, they once more focus on predictors of citize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Torcal, Mariano, Trechsel, Alexander H.
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/70906
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/70906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883319.003.0008
Access Level:acceso embargado
Palabra clave:Evaluation of democracy
Political trust
Winner–loser gap
Populist values
Affective polarization
id ES_652a7cb942b7e4fea0469c5b8a3fa440
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/70906
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspectiveTorcal, MarianoTrechsel, Alexander H.Evaluation of democracyPolitical trustWinner–loser gapPopulist valuesAffective polarizationThis chapter examines how European citizens’ evaluations of different democracy models have evolved from 2012 to 2022, a period of significant economic, social, and political change. Building on the authors’ previous work on this topic, published in 2016, they once more focus on predictors of citizens’ evaluations of liberal, social, and direct models of democracy. The analysis shows a shifting pattern, with evaluations of liberal and social democracy becoming increasingly dependent on trust in political institutions and the impact of electoral defeats. These changes are linked to the influence of populist values and rising affective polarization. Overall, while support for democracy models remains stable, evaluations are more strongly influenced by political factors than before.Oxford University Press20252025infoinfoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/70906http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883319.003.0008reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésTorcal M, Trechsel AH, The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective, How Europeans view and evaluate democracy revisited by/edited by Ferrin M, Kriesi H, 2025, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press https://academic.oup.com/book/59840/chapter/511343585.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/709062026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
title The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
spellingShingle The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
Torcal, Mariano
Evaluation of democracy
Political trust
Winner–loser gap
Populist values
Affective polarization
title_short The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
title_full The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
title_fullStr The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
title_sort The evaluation of democratic performance from a comparative longitudinal perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Torcal, Mariano
Trechsel, Alexander H.
author Torcal, Mariano
author_facet Torcal, Mariano
Trechsel, Alexander H.
author_role author
author2 Trechsel, Alexander H.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of democracy
Political trust
Winner–loser gap
Populist values
Affective polarization
topic Evaluation of democracy
Political trust
Winner–loser gap
Populist values
Affective polarization
description This chapter examines how European citizens’ evaluations of different democracy models have evolved from 2012 to 2022, a period of significant economic, social, and political change. Building on the authors’ previous work on this topic, published in 2016, they once more focus on predictors of citizens’ evaluations of liberal, social, and direct models of democracy. The analysis shows a shifting pattern, with evaluations of liberal and social democracy becoming increasingly dependent on trust in political institutions and the impact of electoral defeats. These changes are linked to the influence of populist values and rising affective polarization. Overall, while support for democracy models remains stable, evaluations are more strongly influenced by political factors than before.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
2025
info
info
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format bookPart
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/70906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883319.003.0008
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/70906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883319.003.0008
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869409721870450688
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia