Social Models for Dealing with Inequalities

This chapter compares social models in Europe and Latin America. The goal is to study the interaction between two institutions: on the one hand, pre-distributive (ex ante) institutions, such as the structure and coverage of collective bargaining and, on the other hand, post-distributive (ex post) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martin, Antonio|||0000-0002-8225-1860, Chávez Molina, Eduardo|||0000-0001-8467-0930, Semenza, Renata|||0000-0001-6392-9624
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:233926
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/233926
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48442-2_2
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Collective bargaining
Centralisation
Wage coordination
Inequalities
Employment
Unemployment
Informality
Segmentation
Neo-corporatism
Descripción
Sumario:This chapter compares social models in Europe and Latin America. The goal is to study the interaction between two institutions: on the one hand, pre-distributive (ex ante) institutions, such as the structure and coverage of collective bargaining and, on the other hand, post-distributive (ex post) institutions, such as unemployment protection and social policy. Pre-distributive institutions are important for correcting inequalities in the labour market, because they introduce guidelines for egalitarian wage structures. Post-distributive institutions help to mitigate inequalities generated in the labour market. The methodology is based on statistical analysis of a series of indicators related to pre and post-distributive policies. The results present three types of model: (1) coordinated economies, typical of neo-corporatist Scandinavian countries; (2) mixed economies, typical of Mediterranean systems, and (3) uncoordinated economies, which equate to liberalism and the Latin American 'structural heterogeneity' model. It is neo-corporatist coordinated economies that generate the most pre and post-distributive equality. In turn, uncoordinated economies, and Latin American ones in particular, generate more inequalities due to highly informal employment and the weakness of their post-distributive institutions.