Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?

This work reports results of the application of electrokinetic fence technology in a 32 m3 -prototype which contains soil polluted with 2,4-D and oxyfluorfen, focusing on the evaluation of the mechanisms that describe the removal of these two herbicides and comparing results to those obtained in sma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: López-Vizcaíno López, Rubén, Risco Manzano, Carolina, Isidro Elvira, Julia, Rodrigo Villanueva, Sandra, Sáez Jiménez, Cristina, Cañizares Cañizares, Pablo, Navarro Gamir, Vicente, Rodrigo Rodrigo, Manuel Andrés
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repositorio:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/11851
Acceso en línea:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.114
http://hdl.handle.net/10578/11851
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Electrokinetic fences
Soil remediation
2,4-D
Oxyfluorfen
Scale-up
id ES_5fea32d093e6e67ce681eec9a697efbc
oai_identifier_str oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/11851
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?López-Vizcaíno López, RubénRisco Manzano, CarolinaIsidro Elvira, JuliaRodrigo Villanueva, SandraSáez Jiménez, CristinaCañizares Cañizares, PabloNavarro Gamir, VicenteRodrigo Rodrigo, Manuel AndrésElectrokinetic fencesSoil remediation2,4-DOxyfluorfenScale-upThis work reports results of the application of electrokinetic fence technology in a 32 m3 -prototype which contains soil polluted with 2,4-D and oxyfluorfen, focusing on the evaluation of the mechanisms that describe the removal of these two herbicides and comparing results to those obtained in smaller plants: a pilot-scale mockup (175 L) and a lab-scale soil column (1 L). Results show that electric heating of soil (coupled with the increase in the volatility) is the key to explain the removal of pollutants in the largest scale facility while electrokinetic transport processes are the primary mechanisms that explain the removal of herbicides in the lab-scale plant. 2-D and 3-D maps of the temperature and pollutant concentrations are used in the discussion of results trying to give light about the mechanisms and about how the size of the setup can lead to different conclusions, despite the same processes are occurring in the soilElsevier201720172017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.114http://hdl.handle.net/10578/11851reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLMinstname:Universidad de Castilla-La ManchaInglésINNOCAMPUS, CYTEMA E2TP, CTM2013-45612-Rinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/118512026-05-27T07:36:41Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
title Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
spellingShingle Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
López-Vizcaíno López, Rubén
Electrokinetic fences
Soil remediation
2,4-D
Oxyfluorfen
Scale-up
title_short Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
title_full Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
title_fullStr Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
title_full_unstemmed Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
title_sort Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides: Part II: Does size matter for removal of herbicides?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv López-Vizcaíno López, Rubén
Risco Manzano, Carolina
Isidro Elvira, Julia
Rodrigo Villanueva, Sandra
Sáez Jiménez, Cristina
Cañizares Cañizares, Pablo
Navarro Gamir, Vicente
Rodrigo Rodrigo, Manuel Andrés
author López-Vizcaíno López, Rubén
author_facet López-Vizcaíno López, Rubén
Risco Manzano, Carolina
Isidro Elvira, Julia
Rodrigo Villanueva, Sandra
Sáez Jiménez, Cristina
Cañizares Cañizares, Pablo
Navarro Gamir, Vicente
Rodrigo Rodrigo, Manuel Andrés
author_role author
author2 Risco Manzano, Carolina
Isidro Elvira, Julia
Rodrigo Villanueva, Sandra
Sáez Jiménez, Cristina
Cañizares Cañizares, Pablo
Navarro Gamir, Vicente
Rodrigo Rodrigo, Manuel Andrés
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Electrokinetic fences
Soil remediation
2,4-D
Oxyfluorfen
Scale-up
topic Electrokinetic fences
Soil remediation
2,4-D
Oxyfluorfen
Scale-up
description This work reports results of the application of electrokinetic fence technology in a 32 m3 -prototype which contains soil polluted with 2,4-D and oxyfluorfen, focusing on the evaluation of the mechanisms that describe the removal of these two herbicides and comparing results to those obtained in smaller plants: a pilot-scale mockup (175 L) and a lab-scale soil column (1 L). Results show that electric heating of soil (coupled with the increase in the volatility) is the key to explain the removal of pollutants in the largest scale facility while electrokinetic transport processes are the primary mechanisms that explain the removal of herbicides in the lab-scale plant. 2-D and 3-D maps of the temperature and pollutant concentrations are used in the discussion of results trying to give light about the mechanisms and about how the size of the setup can lead to different conclusions, despite the same processes are occurring in the soil
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017
2017
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.114
http://hdl.handle.net/10578/11851
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.114
http://hdl.handle.net/10578/11851
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv INNOCAMPUS, CYTEMA E2TP, CTM2013-45612-R
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
instname:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
instname_str Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
reponame_str RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
collection RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869409253443239936
score 15.300724

Similares en LA Referencia